I don’t know why the directors always feel like they need to put some build-up into these things. No one’s watching for the story; just get to the action as soon as possible.

Yes, it was not done well and should not have been included in the reissues of Star Wars.

Or, rather than misusing the technology to edit in new and unnecessary elements the way Lucas did, just replace the weird-looking jowly automaton Andy with the more smoothly-animated model today’s technology allows. The movie will still play the same way you remember it, and the visuals won’t cause you to reflexively…

Right, except the thing that made Jabba the Hutt not work in Ep. 4 was the clear disconnect between the CGI model that had been inelegantly drawn over the original tactile sets. That problem goes away if you remake the entire thing from scratch: backgrounds, models, animations.

This idea DOES accept that old things exist: it keeps the original version available and accessible to everyone! It just also creates a new version that, being created now, looks differently than it might have if it was created in 1995 (while still preserving the same script, shots, animations, characters, etc).

You can carry all the constitutions you want, but unless you put them over your head in a series of protective layers, it won’t do your ass much good.

Well, uh...that sounds like a loose cannon cop, alright!

Solution: re-make the first 3 Toy Story movies using the technology they have for Toy Story 4, so Andy looks like the new, improved version in each edition. Don’t get rid of the original films, but give people the option of watching the originals or the new renders—you can put out new blu-rays and make it a feature of…

I like a lot of DiCaprio performances, but I do wish he had more roles where he played a charming con man. The closest we’ve gotten since is The Wolf of Wall Street, where he plays a guy who thinks he’s a charming con man.

I think the actual problem, as outlined in the article, is that you are shoveling the horseshit into your own mouth so fast that he doesn’t have the time to say, “Huh, this smells funny; I’d think twice before eating it.”

As it should! #ThisTickFucks

Scott & Splenda. Tastes like Splenda... gets you drunk like Scott.

To be fair, if you were in a league with hand-check rules as strictly enforced as they are in the NBA, you might not be used to a “hands on ya” defense.

I propose a change to the rules: a goalie can throw his stick to prevent a goal, but the opposing team is allowed to grab a loose goalie stick and keep it away from the goalie. The other team then has to split its attention between getting the stick back and trying to help defend the goal with a stick-less goalie.

I for one look forward to buying this game and swapping it out for the real one with my friends, so they can all be taken in by the trick and appreciate how clever I am.

No, there is no system of rules by which I can defeat others using mathematical strategy, therefore it is objectively not a valid game system at all. Games are about strategy and thinking, not gross useless things like “reading emotions” that I would totally be good at if there were any logical reason to be.

I would’ve like to see what Julia Stiles could do with the character of Rachel Dawes.

Boy’s got a real cuck face.

They can be described as the story of a suit of clothes being inhabited by a random actor.

Keira Knavely: the naughty person’s Keira Knightley