wsomersetsmaugham
W. Somerset's Maugham
wsomersetsmaugham

No. Fuck him. No one (in my book, at least) gets a pass for claiming to be “pro-life” when they clearly don’t give a damn about already living, breathing children. This bastard is anti-abortion, not pro-life, and that makes him a hypocrite for claiming otherwise.

“Caitlyn just wasn’t relatable,”

It’s your fault for not having the strength and foresight to have a wealthy family and plenty of fuck you money so that you can quit your job without consequences. Sad!

Of course he’s full of shit, every single thing he says is a stupid lie. He’ll never debate Clinton in any kind of real neutral setting, he’ll only do it if he can arrange for a moronic circus scene full of screeching idiots who roar over his spastic twitching and dopey insults. He’s a grade-A coward, a sleazy punk, a

Thnk you. The “controversy” of these emails is entirely fabricated by Fox News. They know their dipshit viewers will never actually READ the emails, because if they did they’d know that 99.99999% of them are complete mundane bullshit with a tiny few implying some leanings toward Clinton over sanders.

I did, and he’s right. Mostly.

This.

Is there a single person on planet Earth who was surprised that long time members of the Democratic Party weren’t particularly thrilled with someone changing party affiliation to take advantage of the network and resources of the DNC and then proceeded to run down the DNC every time something didn’t swing his

I’ve yet to see anything concrete on actions taken to hurt Bernie and help Hillary. I see discussions, but no actions resulting from those discussions.

The DNC can do whatever they want. There’s no law saying they have to be fair. And to be honest, as shown by number of votes each candidate got, their sentiments reflected what the people- the registered long time supporters of their party wanted.

No one is ever entirely neutral, and neither is any organization. In the DNC case, some staffers show that they have an obvious bias for Hillary, but there’s no proof they misused DNC funds or resources to advance her. Nothing written in the email appears to have come to fruition, and no real harm was done.

Bullshit.

It’s a political party. It’s not a government agency.

It’s not that they dumped the info, it’s that they dumped the info without vetting it.

The timing was irrelevant to the Sanders campaign as it was already too late to do anything. It might have been important had it been released maybe four or five months ago, but even then, it might not have mattered. Sanders lost because he couldn’t capture the minority vote, not because of DNC shenanigans.

Bernie voter here too. I certainly don’t like DNC favoritism (it needs to stop, and good riddance DWS), but I’ve not seen any indication that it was in any way outcome-determinative. Clinton simply won the nomination.

People who run political party are biased toward a candidate with a long history in their party, rather than someone who wasn’t in the party until he announced he was running for president?

Did you read the article?

I mean, even the leaked emails fro the DNC barely shed any insight at all. The “worst” emails show a very slight personal preference or distasteful sentiment from a few players. With such a giant dump of files, nothing showed anything that led to actual bias or improper action on the part of the DNC. It’s basically

Yes, because Trump’s voice is sweet, gentle and music to the ears. He never raises his voice. And he smiles constantly! So it’s completely fair to expect the same of Hillary.

If he honestly believes that she was communicating state secrets and confidential information in those emails HOW THE FUCK IS HE GOING TO STAND THERE AND HOPE THE DETAILS ARE HELD BY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT.