This article is pretty slick. I like it a lot. It really clarifies, specifies, and quantifies a fair amount of mostly anecdotal knowledge.
This article is pretty slick. I like it a lot. It really clarifies, specifies, and quantifies a fair amount of mostly anecdotal knowledge.
Actual LOL.
You're mistaken. Check the overhead view shown in this clip:
Good Lord. I think you just wrote the next great American novel.
I understand English, and science, which is the topic at hand. I was just pointing out that it's a sad state of affairs when someone is criticized as patronizing for actually being educated and explaining the correct view of a scientific principle. Someone who posts on a topic should have at least a cursory…
I'm not a physicist or a chemist, just passed basic college science courses, and I don't feel he/she was being condescending at all. The writer of this article just didn't have the vaguest idea what she was talking about before posting. Honestly, anyone who paid the slightest attention during high school chemistry…
I like most of your stuff, but you're really reaching here, and you are one hundred percent wrong to boot.
I actually like cutting them in half, seasoning them cajun style + olive oil - them baking them for 20-30 minutes. It's OUTSTANDING.
YES
Yes, but they have one pretty significant attribute in common: They both kill people.
Haha. Flew about 10 feet over my head. I'm not sure what the point of this article is, to be honest. I mean, is his point that Stallworth's opinion validates the eagle's decision or what?
A reebach, I believe.
With his car actually. My point was that he's about the last person who should have an opinion on someone that associates with alleged murderers.
He hit a pedestrian while drunk I believe.
Yeah - Dante Stallworth actually killed a dude though. Do your research.
Wow. Rarely is a "fun fact" actually a fun fact - but that is an actual fun fact.
You realize that your writing is the least interesting and most preachy of any writer on this network, right? I understand the point you are trying to make, just like all of your overly long, rambling, unfocused "think-pieces." Unfortunately, you are usually so wrong and patronizing that I'm left wondering if you're…
That is awesome.
Same here, but a typically Jewish surname such as Cohen paired with GENGHIS at least made me ponder.
That one has a real chance to go all the way. Also, Erby Ferby vs. Genghis Cohen was an impossible choice.