You actually literally just say they deserve to die by implying that is not in itself a problem. You're also judging children "stupid" or "smart" based on decisions their *parents* made. None of this is cute.

“It is relevant because I was responding to someone saying that smart people can be dumb. I was pointing out that some smart people can have mental issues.” People who don’t have “mental issues” can also be asses. I’m not sure how you haven’t gotten that that’s my point yet. You don’t have to be “crazy” to be a…

I don’t know why on Earth you’re so attached to this idea that she MUST. It’s not necessary to explain anything.

“But a lot of her behavior was clearly mental issue based.” “Clearly” how? You still haven’t said. “She reminds me of someone” is not an answer.

You seem unreasonably insistent on blaming irrational behavior from women on something inherently wrong with their heads. It’s not something that’s especially trustworthy coming from men.

And you still have not answered the question of “why.” Not that I don’t know.

Why on Earth would it be “over and above”? Over and above being racist, I think she has bad fashion sense. Oh, wait, that’s not actually a moral failing, now is it?

If it didn’t cause this why’s it relevant? I don’t think you’re getting what my point is here.

Why is having “mental issues” the worst insult you can think of? Why would that make this WORSE? Why are you so attached to this?

“I’d bet money she has this disorder.” Why, though? I’m saying she doesn’t HAVE to. You are very sure she HAS to. Then you’re asking me why I’m sure she CAN’T. Do you see the projection there? It’s not *relevant* whether she does or doesn’t because that’s not what *causes* this behavior. 

“Despite acting exactly like someone I know who did.” I mean, again, so? Two people doing the same thing doesn’t mean a trait one of them is known to possess is the explanation. That’s not sound logic. Maybe your ex’s favorite color is blue, she had a terrible haircut, and she always talked at the movies. So? Is BPD…

Why do people have to be *constantly* grasping for an explanation intrinsic to people instead of considering that *maybe*, just *maybe,* we live in an incredibly racist society that lets white people get away with this kind of behavior?

I don’t know why you’re assuming she must. Maybe she does. What’s that have to do with anything? There’s no mental illness that causes racism (or plain ol’ entitlement), so it’s pretty irrelevant.

Sad to treat your children to treat people like that, but OK.

I don’t know how you expect me to respond to essentially being told you have a REASON to be bigoted. If you’re not sure how to respond to ME, maybe just sit with that for awhile?

No psychiatric label has a monopoly on making things all about them, as you’re…

Ahahaha.

Or...consider this...she could just be a racist asshole.

I hope the people with BPD in your life are far away from you now. Oh, did you think you were the only person with reasons?

No one made an “accusation.” Words mean things and pattern recognition is permitted. (No, don’t you dare attempt to equate noticing the problems with the system with racial prejudice for one second. We cannot eradicate what we pretend isn’t happening.)

Why are you so sure? Is racism not a sufficient explanation all by itself?

“Otherwise, anybody who is found not guilty could sue the prosecutor.” Well, no? Just like being found not guilty is not sufficient grounds to sue for false arrest. Immunity is not required for misconduct to mean more than “prosecuted a person who turned out to be innocent.”

“Canceled” in a figurative sense, Brickstarter. You clearly aren’t keeping up with Kids Today.

...Uh, no, they mean the ones that were left uncensored, quoted in the previous paragraph. There weren’t any other swears.

It’s not any kind of infraction, which she was told but refused to believe, because how could black people having fun be legal?

Or...she’s racist.