weapons
weapons
weapons

I agree that everyone has their opinion. And I'll leave it at that. Personally, the fact that Apple does not have onsite/in-home warranty already makes it a non-starter. Don't they realize that some people have better things to do then waste their time going to Apple stores or sending things in by mail? They offer it

Magnesium Alloys are fine to use and I have a laptop made of it, it is much lighter than aluminum allowing lighter laptops while still being metal. And plastic differ based on the type of plastic, engineered plastics can be very durable and light.

I rate them average, but definitely overpriced for what you pay.

No clue, but they did go over 100,000 miles from what I hear. I think most of their driving was a long commute.

Because build quality is more than just the exterior material. Build quality is also the quality of components and reliability of them. Which car has better build quality, one where the exterior is resilient but breaks down all the time? Or one which has an exterior that breaks down but interior keep on trucking?

So what is the story here? The Saleen car or the fact that Steve Saleen and Noel Lee have voice boxes and are capable of talking to each other?

Aesthetics yes, build quality no. Even in the laptop days, Apple's build quality was below that of even Dell.

I agree beats are the iphones of the headphone world. Over priced and NOT functional.

You are not factoring in superchargers though which charge at 120kw, soon 135kw.

The 3rd party would have to be a Tesla certified warp drive shop, otherwise the warranty is not covered.

I have heard of much more lamer rewards than that.

It is being held to the standard of other cars, you seem to want to push some kind of new standards on it that no one else has to abide by.

The two issues you described didn't even need service for. One was a reset, the other was a software update. Consumer Reports rated Tesla's reliability as average. There you go, a

Personally, I don't see how this will give ammo to naysayers. Tesla does not want to be exempt for environmental laws. They just don't want to waste months going through environmental reviews only to find there is no issues.

Think of it like getting a permit, there are 2 ways to do it:

1) Waiting for the city to issue a

It doesn't require so much upkeep though, review sites go in for every minor thing because they want content to post about. In reality, all those stuff can be handled at the same time. I mean do you go in for every minor thing?

The powertrain replacements were all refurbs, not brand new. Tesla replaces the powertrains to get the car into the hands of customers quicker. In reality, none of those incidents needed a powertrain replacements.

There is no escaping the fact that first year production models are always going to have minor issues here and there. Tesla is being proactive in replacing the components, so it is too early to judge at this point.

A bill sponsored by California Senator Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) attempts to address the fact that nearly 80 percent of those rebates went to households bringing in more than $100k and that almost half of Tesla Model S owners receiving a rebate are making at least $300,000.

IT is fooling it because it has 4000lb of torque. The dyno is just limited to 2000.

It might be the case. If I remember there is a law in China that if you are caught stealing trademarks, you could get hefty penalties. Obviously China rarely enforces this law (they might be enforcing it in this case due to the pollution in China and push for more electric cars in China) and it only works if they copy

Didn't they learn what happens if you mess with iron man?