300 miles is within hyperloop distance.

The problem with the Florida facility is that they don't own it. Investing infrastructure money into leased property is iffy. As for building a new one, the reason why Texas makes a lot of sense is for the landing part. Landing in Texas is much easier due to a lot of desert, a small miss due to malfunction and you…

Gasoline cars generally randomly combust if that makes you feel better.

You have no clue what you are talking about, first of all, hydrogen is not cheap by any measure. The cheapest hydrogen is made up of fossil fuels. Due to the inefficiency of the fuel cell, hydrogen is no different than a gasoline car on emissions. (other then local emissions)

There is nothing wrong with denying there is a problem if there is no problem. The NHTSA and the german safety agency confirmed there is no problem. So where are you getting?

The formula 1 team is not there for sales or expectations. They are there for improving efficiency of the process.

No mention of 100,000 cars in 2015?

Water is not an issue. If it is anything like the Suminoe factory in Japan, all water is recycled.

Assuming they are turned in. Their business lease aside. The financing/buyback hybrid plan unlike leases favors you to keep the car or at any case sell the car in the private market for higher resale value.

We don't get why Tesla would go to the trouble of securing land, breaking ground, and beginning construction without the intent of, y'know, actually building something at the site. But other states continue to woo Tesla and there's the possibility of multiple locations.

Everyone has their own grading, but when multiple publications are all pointing to Tesla being an awesome car, that is not "marketing". The Tesla Model S is an awesome car, I mean even German and UK magazines are giving Tesla good reviews and they HATE american cars.

So you are saying the consumer reports, the automobile magazines, even people who first hated Tesla until they tried it all gave it good reviews because it wasn't a good product and they fell into Tesla's marketing? Seriously?

It might depend on which sites, but personally I think Apple fanboys get far crazier than Android fanboys. You sure you might not be confusing Apple fanboys acting as Android fanboys? (Have seen a lot of that on some sites)

Well, to be honest, chocolate from cocoa is healthy. What is not healthy is the other stuff they add. To be more exact,

That makes no sense, net income is a measurement of "extra cash". For a company like Tesla which is a growth company to report net income is like throwing money into the garbage. Mostly companies report net income/net profit when they reach an end to their growth cycle, as long as they are growing, the money is better…

Actually, you are wrong. Tesla has had a 25% gross profit on a GAAP basis for a few quarters already. They plan to hit 28% by end of the year. So considering they are doing better and better each quarter and have industry leading gross profits, do explain. your rational.

They are just trying to be realistic, Trump had 5 bankruptcies. They need to do at least 2 more for Burns.

By difference as in technologically or for the consumer?

Impala: 26.8k MSRP
Silvarado: 25.5k MSRP
Equinox 24.4k MSRP

I understand if they get over 30k with options. And there are exceptions like Corvette which is a signature in their brand. I am even ok with large cars going in the 30k territory due to the premium versions tend to be more expensive. But for a…

No, I am saying over 30K is premium car territory and anything selling in that territory is competing against premium brands.