uuman
Uuman
uuman

What’s the last successful reboot of an 80s movie which has been deemed a success? Last one to be well received? Lets narrow the field some more, this was the biggest field of the decade after all; when was the last successful reboot of an 80s horror movie? It has not happened.

I was 5'2" by my sixth birthday. I looked twice my age by the time I entered my teens. Now, the inverse is true. Assuming someones age will get you into a lot of trouble. Don't.

Hrmpf, and within 48hrs of release two patches and v1.03 is causing some of us to crash. Currently trying to reinstall the game to see if this fixes it. When I popped on and saw an update available this morning, figured I'd hit a save point and then install it. I should've known better and just kept playing. Figured

You can ban someone for any reason you choose, but if she gave the reason as racism/sexism and he wasn’t acting in such a manner, his response IS relevant. His actions are shit, but that doesn’t mean hers weren’t. Which would leave Twitch in a tight spot and unsure how to act. And I’ve already put more thought into

He did suffer brain damage as a toddler. It wouldn’t be a stretch to say that’s the likely cause. Though toxoplasmosis could also be a cause. (Humans infected tend to engage in high-risk behavior. It causes mice to lose their natural fear of cats.) The symptoms actually fit his personality very well, in that he tends

They may have been kind people, as stated, and the service and goods rendered complete garbage.Another fact, South Dakota requires tipped employees earn at least minimum wage. They also allow employers to count tips towards their earned wage, at least up to 50%. So the tip isn’t really helping the waitress, which is

Way I’ve alwsys seen it, the name Redskin more resembles the white folks rushing to watch a terrible team play mid-afternoon than it does me. What’s more, the name upsets you lot far more than it ever could me. Which is precisely why it should stay.

Actually, not so much. That’s a more recent thing for them. That’s why they killed off the emulation sites that have been around since the Gamecube era up until last year. They had abandoned most of their classics for 4 console cycles.

Except those things do happen on tv and in movies and are used to reference in-universe generic items. It only becomes an issue when you use a generic, trademarked term to openly reference a real world competitor. Though this generally happens in older content where product placement was less of a financial staple, it

Conceptually, it’s like Photoshop not defending their trademark by allowing other entities to generitize the term to mean altering an image. They actually have to defend the trademark, even if they don’t litigate it. So Choose would have to prove they have actively defended their trademark and as such prevented its

The nostalgia market is still strong. The issue is they keep releasing the same games and they’re limited to their platforms. They essentially killed hundreds of games so they can make a few bucks off of a few dozen.

Or give her a list of the employers, cities and states that require their employers pay employees a fair wage. 

You mean like an esports team who attempted to hire someone primarily based on their genitals? The ‘jounalist’ who used a second-hand quote and then applied his own context to the follow up?

‘It’s sexist because there was enough proof for people who did no research to believe they were a woman, despite being more than enough evidence to prove they weren’t! And that’s doubly sexist because people didn’t believe the obvious lie!’

Except gaming journos have repeatedly been forced or accidentally conceded the claims of GGers ever since. From reviewers getting special rewards or treatment from studios, to specific writers from major gaming review sites plagiarising small independants, etc. Yet these same sites and their drones go on about how

So they decided to hire someone based upon their genitals. A person was then hired based on merit from a group of people claiming to have those genitals. Turns out the person lied about their genitals and this some how enforces the claims of mysogyny.

More like: In desperation to recruit a player based upon their genitals, they failed to properly vet their new player and got caught with their pants down.

But the guys point holds true. The Daddy of Five or w/e on Youtube has repeatedly done the same. He lost the two kids, lost his original channel, yet rebranded and come back at least twice before fan outcry got him removed again. The Pauls have repeatedly broken tos, gotten a slap on the wrist, and continued on as if

That’s not how this works. Marvel licensed the character to them. Once canceled, because Marvel has made it clear they have no intention of extending or renegotiating the deal, the rights revert back to the owner.

Sony also has had a favorable stance on emulation. Be it their MMOs given the 'classic' treatment or not actively seeking to shut down content creators showing their games or emulator sites.