No one sells DLC anymore because microtransactions & lootboxes make so much more money. That doesn’t mean it’s worth supporting such a thing, since it makes money off the back of either people with too much money, gambling problems or worse, children and it’s the most minimal effort BS.

Look at it this way:

I didn’t thank you, firstly. :)

I love being expected to pay for a server to change a txt doc on my machine so I can wear a different texture that’s already on the disc/download

You know I mean more than one F2P game.

I’m not sure I get where you’re coming from. The games aren’t exclusive to Valve because of any other reason than the publishers want them there. Valve isn’t doing anything to get them there other than 1-being popular and 2- having a lot of infrastructure that helps make some things easier.

I’ve seen the defense of the Epic Game Store. Even if someone wants to say “it’s good to see competition” my reply is, yeah, I’d love to see some. Because Epic isn’t providing any. They’re not using competitive tactics that benefit the consumer in anyway, or even the devs in most instances (just the already too big…

Wait, you don’t have a GBA SP on your desk ready to play a game at any time?

I do not, in anyway, support developer harassment. Indie devs getting a bigger cut AND payment ontop of the deal is a huge incentive for them, and I understand that AAA publishers love to store more money in their offshore accounts is not an aspect the devs under them benefit from.

“[he] has been in the industry long enough to remember when players weren’t complete ass-hats to developers and it was pretty neat.”

I’d just like to know if there’s a way to turn off the awful texture filtering you’d find in an SNES emulator for Grandia 1. It has that, what was it called, super eagle filter where it blobs pixels in an attempt to make it look like it’s drawn?

Some of their games, not all. I had a glance around for Metroid, can’t find any.

That’s a frustrating option given that you’ve gotta pay a hefty shipping fee for their stuff.

I’m bewildered by your opening, do you think that being insulting makes anyone want to reply to you? It also doesn’t help your case when you don’t seem to grasp just how aggressive Nintendo is vs other games companies.

I’m aware of Nintendo’s history with fans and their IPs, I’m sure they’d issue copyright claims to individual fanart pieces if their legal dept could figure out a way to make it affordable.

I’m well aware of it’s late conversion to a Wii title, however Nintendo’s stance on as little options as possible is my point. Maybe someone liked the motion controls and would like to use the option that is very likely still built into the code they used. It’s not like the Wii remotes weren’t heavily used with WiiU…

I get it and all that this is their right to protect their copyrights but, do they even sell soundtracks for half these games anymore?

For iPad I’d recommend Clip Studio Paint given it’s got the same features and functionality as the desktop version.

Better idea, remove lootboxes from games you buy. Insulting to have their hands out for the CHANCE to get better gameplay mechanics out of a lootbox or expecting people to pay to get around grind they put in.

This is exactly what I saw when reading his tweet and apology. I was DEEPLY confused what the issue was. I’m not happy with the current gun-laws but I in no way read this as “Guns are okay because they don’t kill half as much people as the flu does a day!”