@Ioan McAvoy: I agree, now that I have been told it was fake, I can tell that I always known it was an obvious fake :-/

@fate47 - meh.: I lol'd

I'm boxing up the little joke here for a second and I'm trying to sincerely imagine a Facebook with a "Meh" or a "Fuck You" button.

@typicalhero: but can you copy paste?

@pɹɐoqʎǝʞuǝʞoɹq: C'mon, you know this holds no water.

@coffinmouth: blasphemy!

I think my nerd is not quite strong enough to really read on after a critique about the optimal character direction of Nibbler. :-/

@Incoherent: fail.

@Edix: okay, i appreciate your response, but now i literally have no idea of what you're trying to say.

@foobat: thought the same thing. mayhe this researcher doesn't have access to that, and those who do are not interested in it enough to provide such information? (or they are, and just not providing that information to him)

@NutshotOuroboros: +1

@Edix: you just spoke nonsense. yeah, it requires 'infinite growth'.... over an equally infinite time horizon... so in other words you just said nothing.

@kelz: being sorry isn't a sign of humanity, its a sign of weakness!

@LukeDukem: prove, definitively, that this particular form of "net neutrality" is evil.

@SEDAGIVE?!: yeah, polygamy should be legal, and a bunch of other completely consensual but batshit crazy (I'm not actually characterizing polygamy in all instances as batshit crazy, but some certainly are) ideas as well, with me drawing a hard line at all parties should be of a legal age... and as much as an…

@Demonicume: haha, you fool. you get this 'security' & I get DOWNLOADABLE GUNDAM WALLPAERS

I'd like to point out that:

@hengehog: thank you, generi-shoe-horned apple rip guy, where would gizmodo be without you?

@cloudnine: you'd make a wonderful IT Security Executive if it was 2001.

@BaggerMcGuirk: that was one of the best 'oh, i guess i didn't even notice HOW HARD AND RIPPED MY NERD MUSCLES ARE' comment I've read in a while.