thischarmlessman
ThisCharmlessMan
thischarmlessman

Schroedinger's pet service? You'll know where it is, but not whether it's alive or dead. At least they're complying with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

But this legislation covers way more than "tiny slivers" of land. Why should we (because really these tracts belong to US the people through the federal government) GIVE THEM away to states to have them turn around and enrich their slimy legislative pockets? Who gets to decide how these goodies are divided? It'll be a

I don't know where to put my penis in.

Not just any hardons, LARGE ones, colliding with more power than ever before.

“his name is 24-year-old Carlos Ramirez.”

That line was an insult to science AND to love!

This is so gloriously dumb I had to star it. Congrats.

I believe it is a business owners' right to refuse service and to do business as they see fit.

Sorry to have the facts rain on your parade, but you are wrong (thanks, Slate!)...

This really isn’t that bad.

It’s not an anti-gay law Tom. It’s just pro-allowing people to be anti-gay.

Dennis Miller?

Putin's gonna Putin.

May he who is without sin cast the first...um...nevermind

We don't preventatively remove any other body parts any more and doing so has been universally panned by the medical body so I don't see why this is different. Even if you concede it serves no function, why would you remove it. You don't remove tonsils or appendixes as standard any more as the article points out the

Any corruption within a government regulatory agency will manifest itself as lax enforcement of regulations to the benefit of those they are supposed to be regulating, not as some sort of over-regulation that we all need to be vigilant of.

For some reason, I always thought crows were jerks. Probably because of something I witnessed over a decade ago biased me against intelligent birds. I have a new appreciation for crows now.