It was literally her responsibility, which is also your point up thread. You are arguing both sides, yawn.

I literally have no idea what about the picture you literally cannot process, unless it’s the mask-free not social distancing? Who are those people and why are we looking at their picture and wondering what you cannot process?

That’s not true. As a daughter of a father that my mother did not let me know as a child, for reasons that are still unclear to me, the damage that a 100% absent dad does to a developing brain is life long. It is better to come to terms with a dad who is a fuckup then to not have any dad at all.

“I was on the BBS internet pre-1991, and can also confirm that VHS video stores existed by then” is a funny way to negate your point about how little has changed in the last 30 years, lol.

Between 1961 and 1991, there was huge social change, yes, but the fruits of the civil rights movement could not be born until the internet and reality TV made it possible for the way queer, trans and POC to be mediated by themselves, for themselves, and to themselves.

Bill Maher should have been put out to pasture after Religiosity.

So now you have gone from asking soooooo many questions all answered by the New York Times Presents Documentary you have not watched, to rephrasing to “probably” statements and completely missing the point of what Patriarchy is.

Thanks, that was very community minded of you. :)

Wow. The sheer volume of opinions you have for us halfwit ladies, coupled with *none* of the insight or understanding that would come with (oh jeez I don’t know) watching the New York Times Presents feature length documentary this article is about, which addresses your every question... chef’s kiss, Pants. It really…

Because PATRIARCHY.

Sure, Pants, you are 100% right: it is impossible for there to be systemic flaws designed to repress, disenfranchise or enslave some and enrich others. What is happening to Britney cannot be happening, therefore it is not! /s

Hm. That’s a lot of thoughts and questions. It sounds like you have never been a young woman commodified, sexualized, infantilized and objectified by a patriarch / the patriarchy, as women (and people of colour) often are.

Fair. But. I could argue that there is only ONE Home Alone movie. So.

Honestly... I do think it’s possible, but Jack was such a one-in-a-million kind of guy, and the NDP is so self-destructive with their middling choices. I had high hopes for Nathan Cullen, but he is leaving federal politics. :(

Oh, my heart.

It keeps him out of all scripted mainstream film and TV. So... no Home Alone 3 appearances.

Consider filing a police report and having him committed / arrested / put in a home. Maybe he needs to be put on a 72 hour hold and medicated, in the very least?

OH MY GOD THIS IS GENIUS LEVEL PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE.

In 2010 here in Canada, we had an unexpected political twist: The Orange Crush. The NDP (third party, progressive) won a landslide of seats, making them the official opposition, holding the balance of power in the country, with Jack Layton the leader of the opposition.

In 2010 here in Canada, we had an unexpected political twist: The Orange Crush. The NDP (third party, progressive) won a landslide of seats, making them the official opposition, holding the balance of power in the country, with Jack Layton the leader of the opposition.