If you can find someone willing to fire those guys from something or to in some other way chastise them, then so be it.

First he'd have to have a case that wasn't dismissed out of hand. At this point, that would be high burden on him to prove that a civil case is even warranted. The financials wouldn't even come into play until he got a judge to agree there's something worthy of trial. Depending on what it is, the NBA lawyers…

What's your point, then?

By mentioning a subpoena? If the evidence meant to bolster a subpoena was obtained illegally, then nothing will happen. Having proof of wrongdoing doesn't mean it can be used in court, even to charge with.

Yeah. Because they didn't have him sign a non-disclosure agreement way back when he first bought the team. Sure. That's what happened.

Well, I guess the old Jewish guy showed US, right?

No. It will make meaningful impact on the morale of the team and the public's view of the Clippers organization and the NBA as a whole.

That's nice and it's true. But who was seriously going to fight for Sterling here? No one should get fired or forced to quit for what they say or do in their private life if it doesn't bleed over into their professional life. But if the people you work with can find a way to get rid of you legally, they probably…

Damn, y'all some HATERS!

Exactly! Make sure the donut is cooked through and cooled off before adding the icing.

During what? Foreplay? Penetration? Both?

It's simple and many commenters aren't seeing it: The Fashion marketing industry like all marketing and advertising, is full of scared people. And the main thing they're scared of is being first. Whether it's first to advocate for something or first to throw it away as "over". So they wait for those more famous or…

See, it DOESN'T MATTER. He's in the club, so to speak. He delivers what they want, when they want, within budget. And all the celebs want to be photographed by him so there's a cachet to his work. That's what editors care about. He was considered "of the moment" and artistic years ago, for whatever reasons. His…

When he actually either gets charged and indicted for something OR celebs and top models say in droves, "I'm happy to be photographed for your magazine as it serves both our interests but I must insist that Terry Richardson not be the photographer."

Or maybe they're doing the same shit William and Kate did and faking us out so they can have a bit of peace and quiet and room for her to think if she really wants a part of the royal roadshow.

She's so booooooooooring. So she's perfect as a late night host.

She looks fabulous. The subtly late 70s vibe of the photography is so right. Such a beautiful woman.

My point was about what the original commenter wrote. Not the artistic merits or lack thereof of "shelfies".

Here's your earlier comment, bitch: "LOL. You swore at a stranger on the internet. Those are some pathetic horns you got there, kiddo. Go back to class now. It's obvious you have a lot to learn."

I think we need photos and film. For...science. Yeah, for science.