thedrdonna
"Not a real" DrDonna
thedrdonna

Orrrr, maybe: Ru Paul’s position is one that fully occupies any space available in the “selling drag culture to the masses” racket, and as such his refusal to include drag kings is not just further evidence that he’s an intellectually uncurious person with a lot of existing prejudices, but also that commercializing

There’s some limited evidence that puberty blockers may cause similar issues to delayed puberty in kids-cardio effects, lower bone density, that kind of thing. Of course, the flip side is a lower chance of cancer, as well. These things are discussed with the kids and their parents beforehand, like any other

Kind of astonished by the number of people in this comment section who seem to believe that there must be a “good” side and a “bad”side in all of this. Y’all. They can both be bad people. I’ve seen no evidence to the contrary so far.

Oh my gods yeah. Like, that dude probably wants to do that so bad, he’s lurking in bushes near Will Smith’s house, waiting for him to walk past.

This seems like the words of a desperately attention-hungry dude.

I can’t tell if this is a joke or not? There’s basically no issue with strontium here, since the tests stopped like 2 or 3 half-lifes ago. With that said, Europe kinda had an issue with Sr-90 too, given that it was one of the big contaminants released by Chernobyl. All of which is kind of besides the point in this

I had something similar happen twice, once because the weather was so bad that the pilot aborted because she didn’t feel comfortable with the landing (which I totally support!) and once because the landing gear got stuck and wouldn’t drop properly. That second one I only found out because Delta pipes(piped?) their

Gotta agree. I went into this hoping for something substantial, but got basically a heaping helping of shitting on conservatives (which isn’t bad, but it’s padding in this context), and a quick, flippant, unsatisfying jab at attempting the definition. As a trans person, I have to say that this article doesn’t help us.

This is the part that bugs the hell out of me! Like, for the vast, vast majority of people that one would meet, they are making assumptions about things like genitals or hormones or genetics that are based on some very shaky observational cues. The idea that you can clock someone’s Actual True Sex based solely on what

So two anti-trans bills and one anti-LGBTQ one, rather than what the headline says? I feel like it’s kind of important to point out that although people across the LGBTQ spectrum are being targeted, the brunt is aimed squarely at trans people. Lumping everyone together as “gay” erases that.

UGGGHHHHHH jesus

Gods, I’m more familiar with Ohio politics than most other non-west-coast states (being as I live in CA), and my deepest sympathies are with you. Most of the political ads we get here are more like “Union doesn’t like this, vote against it!” or the hilarious efforts of the state GOP to pretend they have relevance.
(http

That’s a very cute little vehicle for them to not show up in, then at like 10pm reschedule for another day.

I mean you can’t be both so dumb as to be in danger of death due to forgetting to breath, and also smart enough to cynically grift rubes into voting against their own self interests just to stick it to much-maligned minorities. The two are kind of mutually exclusive.

Maybe he has a prototype of whatever the chromosome-testing ray is that the GOP and TERFs plan to use to enforce single-sex bathrooms and other facilities?

This dude is emblematic of the modern GOP: either irredeemably stupid, or disingenuous and evil, and honestly, the distinction at this point is unimportant.

Stupid, terrible, or single-issue voters. The kind of rubes that buy gold because the shout-man what makes that Blaze website said they should, otherwise [fill in Democrat here] will steal their guns and/or big loud trucks.

The problem with that definition is that it still excludes women who have XY chromosomes, like those with CAIS. At the end of the day, any effort to reduce womanhood to some sort of pithy single-sentence definition is going to fail due to edge cases. Which is also why asking KJB to define woman cannot be anything

I don’t dislike double negatives, but sometimes they aren’t going to not say what you’d rather not say, ya know?

I found the spot: