Oh well, I guess it won't be unexpected for me now.

I think maybe you mean early signs of dementia?

It's more the way they laugh together like their hands are soaking in Palmolive that gets me.

WHAT are they doing to Oleg's hair, though?

Oh — ok, got it.

Matthew was a regular attendee of Rocky Horror midnight movie showings, in season one. Remember he told Stan "It doesn't mean I'm gay, don't worry"?

I like her too, but I think maybe they are laying it on a bit thick with the quips. Those scenes are so much like the "lighter moments" in eighties dramas and soap operas that they make me wince a bit. I guess it's intentional, with the woman being a Mary Kay saleswoman and all, but it verges on patronizing.

Was anyone else surprised at how unslick Jimmy's responses to Chuck's accusations were? They were all really textbook obfuscations, starting with the really clichéd interruption "I don't think we have to listen to this." It seemed clearly intentional on the writers' part that he looked like he was lying, to the point…

This is the first time we've seen them in bed together. I think this was precisely to reinforce that Kim isn't just trying to save her own ass. If that were her motive she wouldn't be spending the night with Jimmy.

I thought that was why they weren't calling 911.

I've read all the comments so far and there's not one "Could they please get someone who — you know — actually LIKES this show to review it?" This bodes ill for Yacht of Stupid.

I, for one, will not become desensitized to the travesty, Eggborne.

I watch it to try to figure out why it's so damn clunky. Because the clunkiness is there in TWD too, just not as bad.

But you aren't going to see the beginning of the zombie apocalypse. They didn't show it last season; they aren't going to show it now. This is going to be characters agonizing over a twelve-year-old writer's idea of moral issues while the zombie apocalypse happens vaguely offscreen.

I get the feeling this show, even more than TWD, is written in segments. There's an isolated feeling to the characters, as if each of them exists in a vacuum and so they have to explain and re-explain who they are and what their purpose is every time two of them happen to bump into each other. This isn't how you…

There isn't any confusion about this show. Glad to see you are finally admitting there are a lot of complaints about this episode, though, instead of chastising all the AV Club viewers for being more cynical, less observant, and more stupid than the general public.

Hahaha — "Speaking for the group," are you?
I seriously cannot stand this tactic.

She has PTSD — is terrified that people are shooting guns at her house — but she won't let Mike stay over at her house when he offers. Won't put him to the trouble. Will, however, always hint at the fact that she needs money and take it from him no questions asked when he offers. Yes, I do think Mike feels sorry for…

Look, whether or not it's ambiguous that Stacy may be playing Mike, it is not ambiguous that he thinks she is playing him. When she hugs him, he doesn't hug her back. He's doing this for Kaylee.

If Howard is a dick he's that way because he IS the firm. In the Rebecca cold open Chuck talked patronizingly about how Howard runs himself off his feet keeping everyone at the firm happy. That is Howard's job. To have as little agency as possible. All these lawyer characters are potential types representing what…