Auli’i Cravalho’s since she’s the one voicing the character too.

My mother and grandmother. My mom also watches Masters of Sex, but likes Donovan way more.

Why is this post in Q&A form?

He is quite right wing and I hate his voting record...but he’s one of the better options. Like Trump isn’t gonna magically pick a dovish leftist.

Corker seems to be far and away the best of the options currently being floated, ‘specially since conservatives hate him for brokering the Iran deal. But we’re probably not gonna get him, so yes I’ll be thankful for moderates.

Yeah, so good he’s decided it’s a waste of time to discuss actual fp with us morons.

Hmm I very much see your point, but I also wonder with Trump ‘cause the most consistent things about him are that he’s self-intrested, wants to be liked, and tends to agree with the last person who he spoke to. He’s apparently really easily to manipulate and Romney (for good and ill) seems to be pretty manipulative,…

You wanna write out a long thoughtful policy rich analysis of why Romney would be a terrible secretary of state? Go ahead. Hell I might even pull it out of the grays.

If you’re tired of being vocal than shut up and stand aside and let those of us who aren’t take over.

That’s probably what I was saying in the last comment, but yeah really it’s more than that. It’s like fobabett said, he’s generally politically moderate and hasn’t gone sycophantic and yet is willing to compromise when it seems important enough. Whatever, we’re gonna go in circles here and not convince each other.

It does relative to Guliani or Bolton. I’d prefer Corker or Petraeus (even with him selling out secrets for sex), but really sliding scale of awful here.

Huh? I voted for Hillary, thought the emails were overblown, etc.

<ugh doublt post>

It was reductionist and generic and likely the wrong thing to say, though citation. But on a serious note, what position has Romney abondoned exactly? He’d mostly said that Trump held abohorrant positions (which he hasn’t backed off on) and would be a bad leader. He’s only backslided on the latter in milqutoast “have…

Because he has experience in gov’t and Bane capitol is global? Look, I’d prefer Corker or Patreus, and will agree that Mitt isn’t the most qualified, but sliding scales of bad here.

*shrugs* I’m pragmatic and feel like ideological purity is partly what got us Trump in the first place. Like do you want a Bolton or Giuliani? As much as it’d be just desserts to have the country burn down on Trump’s watch, living in NYC can only isolate me so much.

It’s amazing how bad his picks are. Like I was reading a story about his pick to run medicare and medicaid and was shocked to learn that she’s actually qualified and skilled at navigating roll outs to Republican states. She also had a conflict of interest (like just about every pick of his...), but I almost don’t care…

All politicians are fickle and self-interested...but it could also be out of a sense of duty to the country ‘cause Trump is also considering people like Guliani and Bolton.

I don’t really care if this is to further his political career so he’s set up for a 2020 run for presidency, as the idea of Guliani or Bolton terrifies me. Yes, Corker or Patreus would likely be better (though the latter is also a not great choice), but I’m a pragmatist.

Can we stop criticizing Mitt for going for SOS? He’s sane, competent, and qualified-qualities sorely lacking in most of Trump’s cabinet picks. Also, he’s at least somewhat willing to criticize Trump, at least enough to completely unhinge Kelly Anne. I take that as a good sign.