It’s spotlighting the toxic culture by making him the hero in his own story? That’s not it works.

Hey, heads up on a bad link in the article:

...I was just explaining some of the science behind climate change for you since you seem confused! Not everywhere will be affected equally. Many places in Florida will be more difficult to protect against flooding, for example, as they’re built on more porous limestone, so the types of sea walls they use in the…

If you actually want a scientific explanation: most of the danger of flooding on Martha’s Vineyard due to climate change is on the Southern-most and Eastern sides. The property they bought seems to be in an inlet protected by the breakwater on the South, although in 30-40 years maybe not, especially if it’s hit with…

> But they still went and got the yogurt. One would think climate change is a bit more important than a snack.

> Unless the paparazzi have first class tickets, TSA would arrest them following celebrities into the airport.

..

You realize that Ted talk is based on the UK (hence the TedxWarwick logo), right? That’s why the US is on the left of the map with greater land area, and it doesn’t take into account the United States’ greater kWh/day capacity due to our sunnier weather.

Not sure why you had difficult comprehending what I said. I clearly know the benefits of nuclear (and I listed some negatives that you conveniently left out) but my reply was about how deeply weird it is some people just want to discuss climate change by ranting about nuclear and don’t seem to have the capability to…

I’ve got no problem with nuclear as a part of a broad spectrum of necessary solutions (although the negatives include big initial cost buy-in and the fact we don’t have a real nuclear waste solution) but it’s also deeply weird there are some people who only want to discuss climate change by ranting about nuclear and…

Everyone should know this is step two of the playbook:

customs can always refuse you entry and you basically have no appeal

After everyone reads the summary written by Barr, they should go read the Iran-Contra scandal entry on wikipedia and Barr’s contribution to it.

Don’t forget the “What seems to be the problem, occifer?”

The Constitution was written with a fear that politicians would get arrested purely for political reasons to keep them from being able to make it to a crucial vote. In today’s turbulent political climate, I think that this fear is still well founded.

Okay, but this article is about things we can actually litigate in a court of law. That a large portion of our population are racists who fell for a racist con artist isn’t.

I guess I more dislike what Russiagate represents: it’s a certain crowd of centrist liberals trying to pretend Trump didn’t win 

The history of indicting a sitting a president is also against us. 

This is a good example of incompetent nonsense we have to fight against.