It’s sad that Jalopnik is part of the Gawker/Gizmodo group. I wish we could just leave shit like this off the site and stick to metal, gas and speed
It’s sad that Jalopnik is part of the Gawker/Gizmodo group. I wish we could just leave shit like this off the site and stick to metal, gas and speed
I know we’re supposed to hate this woman because she’s white and is supposedly living in the wrong neighborhood based on that, but I’d be pissed too if some asshole parked his ice cream truck outside my house and played annoying music every day, and then told me to “fuck off” when I tried to be upfront and work with…
You’re judging it without any cultural context.
And it finally unveils itself.
It has nothing to do with how people see women, but how women react.
I agree with the entire article, but dat wage comment just sent me to the shadow realm.
I was fully on board with your article, but this comment...ugh.
Mizz. D’Anastasio, what you’ve just typed is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this site is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and…
Suck it up, buttercup. Why should other anon dudes stick up for some rando sensitive woman online? Fyi - Women “earn” less in the workplace, they aren’t unfairly paid less. Viagra is never covered for ED - just blood pressure.
Women get paid less because of 14 yr olds playing Xbox. Lmfao why are t women taken more seriously?
There has to be more to this. Don’t get me wrong, there’s no excuse for *either* parent to subject a child to this type of abuse (and yes, a stepfather is a parent...they’re married), but there’s a couple things that got my spidey sense tingling:
Anything else you approve of that they should do? What about any choice phrases? While some of these weirdos had a predictable right wing slant when discussing politics, none of them seemed interested in Nazi or racist ideology. But who cares because left wing fascist number 116 says they’re clearly in the wrong.
Yes. It is wrong to publically attack the credibility of a alleged victim of sexual assault. It is also insensitive and evil to call them horrible names.
However, it is equally wrong to ignore the bedrock principal of the American justice system which is no matter who is doing the accusing, no matter what it is the…
A family member of mine was accused, falsely, of molesting a minor. The accuser was mad about something said family member had done and wanted to use that as revenge.
Yeah... you missed it. The guy is worried about being falsely accused of sexual assault. He worries that he’ll have normal, completely consensual sex without doing a single thing wrong and then later be accused of rape. So he’s trying to protect himself by proving that the other party agreed to sex.
Unfortunately,…
I knew a guy who went to jail for having consensual sex with a woman. Her boyfriend came in and she screamed help me, and he went to jail. He proved at trial she was a cheating, lying, dirty cheap ass whore that lied to save her relationship. He was saved when the people who were eating dinner with them relayed the…
Hypocrisy applies regardless when you’re the blog crying about someone else’s typos.
It’s funny that gawker slams every typo trump makes on twitter but seems to also be contractually bound to disable spell check and forego any proof-reading before pressing the publish button.
Probably. But the last few decades have revised what likely happened as a result of European contact.