Haggis has been very vocal in exposing and criticising the nasty practices used by Scientologists to harass and discredit ex-members

...the way Paul’s vocal fillers tend toward misogyny, talking about his dick, and, of course, a few choice racial slurs

He’s an actor. Part of his stock in trade is public goodwill. Is it now his employers’ responsibility to absorb the hit to his good name?

I think it is when they make it one, and I think putting your personal business out there for the world to share and to invite engagement and judgement, that says a whole lot about them. And I’m not saying it says bad things about them, but if you’re going to do that, which they clearly are, then I think the time for…

Man, that could be a wild decision. The conservatives warring within themselves over states’ rights vs. their tendency toward draconian drug law enforcement, the liberals fighting between broad public will and compromising federal authority. Because if they strike down the federal government’s capability to enforce…

I guess it would depend on whether or not you thought watching people having sex was inherently “voyeurism.” Back when words meant something, the peeping aspect was an important component of the term. Otherwise, what makes it different from watching anybody do anything? Because dirty, nasty sex is involved and that…

In a counter intuitive yet bold move, his replacement will be Bob Barker.

I hope the hippies who made fun of his tie in college are thinking long and hard about the consequences of their actions.

Yet another judgy response to a comment I made on a story about people airing their ostensibly personal business on a public forum. Why shouldn’t I want more details? I’m not one of these “oh, I know what happened” type of people. I don’t have an agenda that compels me to fill in the gaps with the narrative I’m…

Because if people didn’t keep responding to me, I would not have thought about this any longer than it took me to read this story and make my comment.

Why do you need my details so bad? Are you a complete creep, or are you someone who feels like they have a better understanding of things as more information is provided?

Says the guy who clicked on this story. You’re right; it’s not my business, it’s my entertainment. I just think if someone is going public with their story, then let’s get the full story. How else am I supposed to know exactly how much to hate the principals involved?

If you’re going to put on a show, I have every right to be critical of it for being overly enigmatic.

Christ people, if you’re going to air your dirty laundry in public, do you have to be so cryptic about it? You’ve made the world a part of your story now, so quit being coy with the details.

As usual, the text of this article is so consumed with self-righteous snottiness that the actual meat of it gets lost, and I’m left wondering, why are we so angry about this?

But...

I was curious how she handled X so I looked it up. I guess that was a way to go, but if I had been in her camp, I would have suggested the following:

Maybe someday someone will put a literal foot in his ass.

Yes, occasionally he will smile in pictures, and then he looks psychotic.

Hell, even Steve Carell is barely Steve Carell.