skipbifferty
skip bifferty
skipbifferty

“Hurr, durr anonymous sources.”

No, I’m saying you came to the self-serving conclusion that I believed TIME contacted him for that Person of the Year interview and photo shoot based on the fact I was calling bullshit on how a couple of anonymous sources saying Trump claimed the Access Hollywood was “not authentic” (quoted from the actual NYT

Yes, you have certainly proven your point that people don’t make self-serving conclusions based on scant evidence.

The difference would be- agree with it or not- that I’m spelling out what I see could be happening. I’m calling out what look like shaky details, and I am providing context for my conclusions. You’re just calling me names and telling me what I’m not, and the only thing you offer as substantiation is your willingness

Yes, “a senator” and “an adviser” seem to have gone all-in on this campaign to convince the world the Access Hollywood tape is fake. That’s why it’s all anybody has been able to talk about since he originally allegedly said it earlier this year.

Pardon me and the other people for challenging your intellectual laziness and propensity for ideologically based cheap tricks.

“a senator”, “an adviser”

Josh’s final conversation with Kronish is rather affecting, and almost (almost) justifies the amount of time spent on people arguing whether or not to kill him.

Yes, I’m sure nobody has ever written an article about any of those subjects.

I guess it would be about the difference between curing a disease and just quarantining and firebombing its carriers.

Maybe so, but if Hitler thought that oral hygiene was important, it doesn’t mean I’m going to let my teeth rot and fall out of my mouth.

No, I’m not going to watch this, because it does not address my commentary. If something is blatantly, objectively offensive, then it should be dealt with as such. My quote is explicitly about material that is not, which “appear to have been uploaded with innocent intent, often by the kids themselves.” And why I

To be clear, most of these videos—which. usually incidentally, show young children in various states of undress—appear to have been uploaded with innocent intent, often by the kids themselves. But they appear to have allegedly drawn comments from people viewing the videos with sexual intent, creating a bizarre

I think it’s pretty consistent with the show’s concept of self being profoundly influenced by one’s circumstances. Hell, Kronish got beaten in one dance-off in college and it so fundamentally rocked his confidence that he ended up practically a subordinate at his own company.

Part of the problem is that the show often makes Josh such a willfully obtuse drip, it’s hard to see why his point of view is the right one, despite Future Man clearly pushing him as the moral arbiter of the group... One would think stopping a global apocalypse might supersede Josh’s dislike of hurting anyone.

To the burglars who stole 1,800 gallons of vodka from an L.A. distillery this week: Trust us, we get it, you’re an organized crime outfit, and thus are probably pretty scummy people.

“It probably has better chicken, too.”

If I’m in a fight with somebody and they punch me in the dick, my thought isn’t that this is some sort of misandrist statement; he did it because that’s what hurts the most. Mel Gibson may be a low-blow artist in these types of angry outbursts, but I do not see it as some sort of proof-positive indication of a racist

Oh Fox News, you are every bit as charming and informative as the 12-year old bully on the playground you so clearly emulate.

“These people are many things—gullible, quick to anger, incorrect”