It’s not possible for morality to be objective. For something to be objective it must be divorced from the feelings or opinions of the observer and judging morality depends on those feelings and opinions. They’re mutually exclusive concepts

Gaia’s fucking tears. “My religion says X” does not make an argument objective, it makes it subjective *by definition*

“Because we fight for truth whether you recognize it or not, especially when it involves the murder of another person”

“Corpses are not committing murder to undo a situation they willingly committed”

That’s exactly what you were doing, but whatever

“We can codify pro-life into law by overturning Roe v Wade”

That has nothing to do with anything, you’re deflecting. I’ll clarify: in your opinion should organ donation, after death, be mandatory? Yes or no?

Understandable, forget I asked. Sometime I wonder if I pay too much attention to national issues and not enough to state level

“we ultimately cannot assert pro-life without invoking our Christian beliefs”

Question for you: should organ donation be mandatory?

A point I always try to get through these people’s heads is that the government that says you can’t have an abortion is the same government that can say you *must* have an abortion

Fuck I hate the “we’re not forcing you to have the baby, we’re just saying you can’t kill them” canard. IT’S A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A FUCKING DIFFERENCE YOU FUCKING MORONS!

DougCo? That’s the only other one I can remember talking about pulling that shit

Fucking. Nailed. It.

The problem is that their focus is all wrong. They see single-payer as an end in and of itself rather than a means to an end.

Damn, dude’s gonna need some bactine for that burn

“As a country, we do a very poor job of instilling that sense of responsibility”

Point of order: that’s dumbass, rural area sheriffs that are whining about “gun sanctuary” shit as backlash against the recently passed red flag law. It’s not a state level problem

This is exactly why I’m against the use of police dogs in any other capacity than searches (and even that’s iffy) 

“How can you protect and serve if you view the population as both a threat and a group to exert force and control?”