yeah.. because game reviewers are the same as the press out there >.>

and you already have proof unless you are saying Harry Potter is just an AI.. someone on the other side of the keyboard made the decision to betray his teammates.

i think that might have a part in it i think both sides know it.. but if you are working on something and you aren’t ready for a conference and there is no guarantee they will be ready when a leaker gets the information out and reviewers run with it.. well it can cause a problem.

this is about game reviewers not the free press. and don’t act like President Obama didn’t spend 8 years attacking the press as well.. Fox in particular.

don’t act like MSNBC isn’t all in for the democrats.

you say that like both sides don’t do the same things.

look again.. i’m saying that it isn’t just the game companies and i should remind you.. Kotaku is basically like the game companies. Kotaku is a business which looks to make a profit no different than the game companies. the products may be different but the end goal is the same.

let’s not pretend reporting on games is anywhere close to journalism. they are reporting but i’d hardly put the two together.

i could see a problem if the insider signed a confidentiality agreement. then yes that is a problem and as bad as someone hacking into the system.

it’s like you don’t even understand what i’m saying.

you know what.. let’s go your way.. where people don’t have choicses and don’t go.. well maybe this isn’t the way to go.. nope in your world they have only one choice.. that’s it.

are you completely stupid? the they agreed to be on the team to protect the ship and then betrayed said group to destroy ship. what part of betrayal does that not mean to you?

yeah figured.. but what you stated points out why bethesda has the policies they do.. no reason to be surprised at that. sure it got them clicks but it also poisoned the well so to speak.

or maybe both sides have something from it.. think about that?

what is so hard about thinking about it before you do it? that perhaps they are part of the reason why companies like bethesda don’t trust their games getting out before the release date.

certainly the latter would simplify things..

i do however know what the word maybe means.

they will do it since they have the mentality.. to betray if it suits my needs. such people who do so cannot be trusted.

then reread it since what i typed is pretty clear. it means.. you have an option.. you don’t have to always print leaked information.. you can choose. is it worth it to go with the leaked information or would doing so poison the well so to speak.

what the hell.. you want to continue to make excuses for them. they betrayed their oath.. game or not a betrayal is still a betrayal.. what part of that is so hard for you to understand? are you purposefully being stupid? or unethical?