sharon69
sharon69
sharon69

The Tesla is more likely to have software bugs because the whole company is run like a software start-up (meaning very short & fast release cycles). Plus Tesla has less engineers dedicated to fixing bugs compared to the larger manufacturers.

That thing looks funny. Subaru should put these on the Crosstrek, but I know they won’t because of fuel economy.

I was just LOLing at your trailer-trashy, inbred, poor & stupid, fatty from the suburbs response. LOL was the only way to sum it up, sorry. But you’re right, I am on a higher moral ground, since I actually drive and ride a bikes. My “fixie” is a $20,000 limited edition Colnago track bike that hangs from a wall. None

LOL except 90% of cyclists also drive — at least that’s the case here in Portland, Oregon, which has the highest number of people who commute by bike. And remember, motorists have killed far more people than cyclists ever will. Someone who’s ridden a bike will be a much better driver as a result.

It really depends on the car and the weight. For passenger cars around 3000 lbs, I’d say 260-300hp is good enough for most situations. “Reasonable” sports cars, I’d say 350-400hp. Anything heavier, I’d rather have better torque than high horsepower. Take the Audi Q7 TDI for example. It’s nearly 5500 lbs and does fine

That’s contrary to the numbers & facts. If what you said is true, free market dynamics should put other car makers ahead of Toyota, which is clearly not the case. Just because a car uses more features and overcomplicated electronics / mechanical systems to make ride & handling more comfortable, doesn’t mean it’s

I have a ‘16 Trail Premium and the power is adequate, at least for me. Loaded with AC on full blast and 2 extra passengers, it can feel a bit anemic, but I only feel it when going uphill. Not a big deal though, it’s not supposed to be a sports car.

They’re “better” because they’re cheaper or because they outlast Toyotas? Because if they don’t outlast Toyotas, they’re not really better.

The 4Runner is also body-on-frame unlike the unibody JGC. Plus, who cares about all the fancy electronics and luxury? That’s just more stuff that will break.

This must be why the Tacoma and 4Runner have the best resale values out of any vehicle according to KBB. In about 15 years, we’ll see how many JGC will still be on the road. I sure see a heck ton of old 4Runners.

If that’s the case, then a Honda Civic is as much “art” as a Ferrari. Both cars are designed entirely by computers and manufactured by machines. The Ferrari is hand assembled, making it more prone to production errors and more expensive to build. But being hand assembled doesn’t necessarily mean it’s hand made or hand

Uhm during its time, classical music was equivalent to what pop music (Justin Bieber) is today. Why are you romanticizing outdated inferior technology (Ferrari)? What makes a gasoline engine so emotional and artistic? Does the sound and vibration make you feel like a big and bad and powerful alpha male? Does that

LOL this guido is such a typical Italian. Ferrari doesn’t “want” to make electric cars because they can’t — as in, don’t have the experience and know-how. Ferrari (just like Lambo) can only make loud, attention-seeking sports cars based on 100-year old technology that’s as efficient as the incandescent light bulb.

Yep, I’m aware of the head gasket issues, but I always figured Subaru had fixed those problems in the late 90s/early 2000s. Maybe not. Coincidentally, after the 2009 model year Subaru got rid of the turbo in the Outback but still offers the naturally aspirated H6. So that leads me to believe that the turbo engine

Just to add to that...Subaru recommends the first oil change for turbo engines at 3000 miles (!) and then every 3750 miles.

I learned about oil changes the hard way a few years ago. Had an ‘09 Subaru Outback XT with less than 35,000 miles on it that needed a complete engine rebuild. I hadn’t changed my oil for 8000 miles, which I didn’t think was THAT bad for a modern car (plus I was using synthetic). About 48 hours prior to its death, the

So when the OEM tires are at the end of their life and I replace them with a different brand all-season tire, the car is then “modified”? Really?

Anything that voids the warranty. Wearable items like air filters, engine oil, windshield wipers, tires etc. aren’t really modifications. Are the tires stock size? If yes, then it’s not a modification. No new car, truck, SUV or otherwise will perform well in the snow with stock all-season tires. I thought people knew

OK I take that back. It does appear to come with a rear & center locking differential and an air suspension that can brings it up to 9.6in (not bad), although I don’t think those options are standard. I suppose it would make a really good snow car. But for this price, there are better options especially if you never

Uhm, you implied that snow tires are a “ modification “ which they aren’t. I pointed out that most people will put snow tires on their car in winter. So what are you moaning about? They were most likely snow tires.