“ While the piece can’t help but comment on Hilton’s discussed-to-death voice (“it’s “several octanes deeper when off-duty, compared to Paris Hilton’s ‘on duty’ soft, coquettish, baby voice”)...

No wonder he’s such a grump.

No, gaslighting based on the score would be if the game told the player all racers were weighted the same, and that the player must be imaging that they’re being penalized for being a certain character. The player “feeling tricked or lied to” doesn’t make it gaslighting. Gaslighting is about convincing the person…

Because Railroads have a monopoly in the area they service. they don’t worry about bad publicity like other corporations do...

Around here they are already out there in traffic on e-scooters, e-bikes (that can go 30 mph) and one-wheels. Why not license them.

Hot take: we do not live in the “era of nepo babies,” and if you care about this issue even a teeny tiny bit, congratulations, you are a fucking idiot.

NTSB Investigator: according to this manifest, these tankers were carrying *adjusts glasses* ‘500 long tons of certified premium dank’

Perhaps, but I think the cat’s high value is what makes it an issue as a court would normally not care about a really low value pet. I’m no bankruptcy expert but just did a google search on pets and bankruptcy and got the following excerpts;

Come to New Orleans.

Look at that! You just wrote an entire country song!

Come on, Mes. They’re saving themselves for the right cheating husband.

These are not audit or financial records.

Instead, the secret point bonuses led people to feel gaslit about how difficult it was to achieve three stars on lighter characters.

This is highly dependent on climate.

Every company I worked for has a communication retention policy.

Having retention policies is standard practice for most large companies. It isn’t about hiding information, it’s about managing legal risk. If you have a policy to purge chats or emails on a well known, specific time period, and its applied uniformly across the business, this limits evidence in a potential future…

Seems like an awful large stretch to say the “train was already on fire” just because a hub detector indicated a bearing was warm 20 miles before derailment.

In 50 years they havent developed any technology to get from one side of the highway to another?  In 50 years businesses have only developed on one side of the bridge? 

The way I understand it (IANAL), you’re not required to preserve any of it just because of possible “future legal action.” Only if an actual “litigation hold” has been filed, which it sounds like in this case it wasn’t during the period in question? If you had to preserve things for possible future use, you could…

Anyone who works in enterprise IT knows that there’s billions of lines of logging that can be produced per day, between the 10,000 systems working at all the OSI layers. Switches, firewalls, routers, load balancers, web servers, applications, etc etc.