Yes, because male drivers never crash. Lol.

Usually those are called parents, but in this case...

"Poor people need to stop being bitter because they decided not to move up aggressively in life." Spoken like someone who truly does not understand that when you get a large enough group of people lacking education and opportunity, they "decide to move up aggressively in life" by taking out their oppressors. Ignorant,…

The problem is, the poor white men are even more scared and believe that Romney will save them. I alternate between laughing hysterically, trying to calmly explain why this won't happen, and shaking in terror because they could swing the election.

Found it! http://jezebel.com/5948719/why-porn-sex-is-the-safest-sex

My understanding is that condoms dramatically increase skin abrasions. I assume they have industrial sized pump jars of lube - it's a necessity for hour upon hour of intercourse whether condoms are involved or not. Here's the article I was looking for. Oh my, would you look at that - it's from Jezebel!…

I watch a lot of kink.com (well, the trailers anyway - I'm cheap) and I very seldom see condoms. Maybe specific channels are more prone to condom use and those aren't the ones I watch?

Actually that's not the correct link, although it is helpful. I am searching for the one I meant to link to. Sex in porn is not like sex in real life, in that porn shoots last for hours. Such prolonged periods of sexual activity degrades condoms and also causes skin abrasions, which increases risk of exposure…

Here is a really fantastic blog entry about why condom use in porn actually exposes performers to more risk, not less, and why the industry should be allowed to regulate itself. I'll be voting "No". http://stoya.tumblr.com/post/32205235912/testing-vs-condoms-in-pornography

I would say that if you walk into a meeting looking objectively worse than you did a year or so ago, people are going to pay more attention to what's going on with your physical appearance than they are with what's coming out of your mouth. But if you want to believe otherwise, you are free to do so.

That's an assumption I didn't make, but I see how it supports your own dig at me, so feel free.

I appreciate that you might not think that my original comment - "unflattering" - could encompass unclean. Quite frankly, I thought of making that point in my original comment, and decided not to because it seemed mean. It is very, very naive to think that appearances do not have an impact on our public lives, and if…

No, I'm pretty sure she's getting trims and color, so she has the time.

Well, in my opinion, it does look stringy and greasy in this photo, which is why I made my comment. Pulled back does not equal not stringy/greasy. And I'm not holding a different standard - if Kissinger had had stringy greasy hair, I'd have called him on it too.

Sigh. OK class. Time to acknowledge that we don't live in a fairytale, and how we look and how we present ourselves, especially in a diplomatic setting, very much matters. Henry Kissinger was not the best looking dude in the world, but when he traveled to represent US interests, he was always well groomed and well…

I love me some Hillary, but I just can't with her new hairstyle. It's just not flattering. Please, Hil. Hie thee to a decent stylist!

Ha ha. It's fine. I'm in the "acceptance" stage of grief over my youth. ;-)

More proof I am old: until I reached the second line, I was boggled trying to figure out how a 1500s artist was related to an article about asian weaponry.

I interpret it as they set themselves on fire but were not fatally injured in doing so.

Michael C. Hall beat cancer. I'm sure a tattoo on the foot is child's play to him.