if you’re gonna make a sexist joke in the comments of an article about sexual abuse against minors, at least get creative with the story. *Throws box of tampons* “boo!! get off the stage!!”

I mean, yes, but 1 ) Hillary has wayyy more resources than Bernie to pay all her staffers more and 2 ) Hillary still pays men more than she does women, for average and median salary (and Bernie pays staffer women more than men). So...that’s something too.

What you’re missing is that the average and median salaries for Bernie’s staff is higher for women than they are for men (and the pattern for Hillary’s folks is opposite, favoring men). I’m not saying this compensates for the stats about Bernie you point out, but I am saying that there’s nuance to this and we can…

Kinda like how Bernie’s average and median salaries for staffers are higher for women than they are men, whereas Hillary’s male staffers are paid more on average than women? Representation at the very top is not the same as gender equity. IMO both candidates fell short of the ideal, but you can’t applaud/criticize one…

Thank you! Ideally, we’d have gender parity in terms of overall pay distribution AND equitable representation at the top 10 highest paid positions for campaigners. This is making me wonder if the issue is due to lack of basic statistical knowledge or biasing an article in favor of Hillary. Either way, kinda…

So, Marco Santagata is Nino, right? Because that is SUCH a dirtbag Nino move!!

I find it misleading and kinda irresponsible that you describe Hilary’s male and female employees as “making essentially the same” amounts, although women’s average salaries are almost $2,000 less than men’s. And you also fail to explicitly point out how Bernie’s data shows women are actually compensated better than…