Clearly this is a coordinated attempt by the media to character assassinate America’s most successful pumpkin

“Those people have access to a hundred years of films, books, and television all about slavery. If they don’t “know” about it, they don’t want to.” I know exactly what I’m talking about.

Your response was 100% contained to if they were curious they’d have seen it by now, nothing to do with the sensationalist aspect nor that people can’t be entertained our of racism.

You absolutely did. Someone suggested a reason why someone would wanna tell this story and your response was basically “nah lol”

Sincere question here: there seems to be a (pretty understandable) backlash against people trying to convey the emotions or experiences of marginalized peoples that they themselves don’t belong; would you honestly have liked if Parker tried to view rape through a female lens or would you bemoan that a lack of creative…

Cool that you get to be the arbiter of what stories should be getting made or if a movie has a purpose.

Prefer the days of the saw movies where torture porn was kept lily white?

“Equality feels like discrimination” when yall will believe a woman’s claim with no proof but gladly condemn a dudes claim with the no proof. That’s fine, of course women need the benefit of the doubt given the systemic discrimination they’re gonna face. But if you say you’re doing it in the name of equality it’s…

Aw sweetie what happened to not engaging with trolls :( we both thought you were better than this

Or hey maybe people aren’t feeling sympathetic towards her because sh just lost in shiny pebbles what poor countries don’t have in food. But please dear god WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THE RICH PEOPLE

Fairness to you though Sanders absolutely dropped the ball on trying to unite his base and that’s totally on him

Nothing trollish about it. Clinton’s was a party division whereas in Sanders case it’s democrats complaining independent voters didn’t switch to them. But keep on acting high and mighty you intrepid hypocrit

There’s always been the party difference between Clinton and Sanders. In 08 it was party democrats that needed to be pulled in line. In 2016 it was independents and previously uninterested voters that really helped bolster Sanders’ numbers. Obviously it’s gonna be different to try to get people to follow a party line…

Yeah but the Clinton hold outs were party democrats, the Bernie bro Stein/Johnson converts are either independents or people who wouldn’t have voted to begin with. That’s why it’s always been a mistake to assume Sanders’ supporters would all eventually follow a party line; it’s not their party

Hey now, she could totally pass as a Chernobyl 40

Good to see Clinton supporters tearing down a 70 year old successful woman for using a tactic they themselves used in 08. Stay classy party politics

Kinda like those Clinton supporters threatened to do in 08? How quick y’all are to turn on tactics you made popular

You’ve never had the option of anonymity in the internet era

Ah yes, who can forget how examining events in someone’s life interacts with their life so unfairly favors white men. No woman or person of color has ever had an impactful event influence their work. Never happens.

I’m a medical user and I’ve been in treatment for both coke and alcohol. Just because it’s pot doesn’t mean it can’t be a negative influence in someone’s life. I’m not saying it is in Pitts case, but you seem pretty positive he’s not just bc it’s pot. Which is a bit of a simplistic approach to how addiction works