That’s smart, so then HE can make MOST of his appearances, and somebody ELSE can make the rest of them.

Bradley Cooper, star of the original Limitless movie and an executive producer of the CBS TV version, has made most of his appearances on the show (including the time he voiced a talking CGI fetus).

We can take what they’re doing (occupying a government building while heavily armed) seriously while not taking them (redneck dirt merchants with no point to prove by their actions) or their ideals seriously. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. We can also take the egregious lack of government response…

Oh, ONLY a heliocarrier :P

Yep, this X1000. The person who returned the block of wood was a huge asshole, but he was just trying to scam a corporation, not a kid. The Target employees involved in letting that box get back in circulation are the real pieces of shit here.

It’s a slightly traumatizing experience that involves net guns, tranquilizers, and blindfolds.

I dunno, I think what we’ve seen of the bounty hunters & their world were goofy and over-the-top enough to make for an interesting show.

Some good sounding stuff in there! I’d love to see The Wretched Emily Derringer happen.

HA, this is great. I made a little Batcave sign generator when I was bored a while back - http://batshit.xyz/

There are 3 books in the series, but I have no idea if the show adapted the arch of the first book or all 3 crammed together.

But it’s not a “big, pissed off bird”. It says IN THE ARTICLE that the bird was “remarkably calm”.

All they need to do is cast legitimate actors, like say... Benicio Del... oh wait, shit...

No. No. No. No. No?.. No.

I seriously doubt the working environment in the offices is 1-1 analogous to the stores.

FTA: “Lay out an extra hotel towel and get at it.”

You’ll enjoy this then... http://www.view-master.com/

I think the bigger concern is financial - they’re afraid of one movie stealing the other’s thunder and them competing against themselves.

Confused about what exactly? This chart has nothing to do with my comment or the one it was a reply to. I was replying to clickSucka who said “Absolutely correct. I don’t trust anyone that cherry-picks definitions. Need a new definition, use a new word.

They confuse the hell outta me.

Incorrect. They didn’t say they are uncertain, they said they believe there is no God but cannot prove it. No one can.