The thought alone of ZS even contemplating making such a film had me bemused; thank you for that much-needed lift!
Panagiotes Koutelidakes
panagioteskoutelidakes
This is another example why, at times, I have little sympathy for the progressive movement (despite being part of it). I have found that it just so happens, now and then, that someone wears blatant blinkers.
His point was that the very idea of distinguishing forms of intelligence as “real” would be moot at that point; it’s a functionalistic proposition: that provided an identical function, the distinction no longer makes any sense.
Joking aside, that’s still technically murder.
Well said; also, let’s not forget that the original was already pretty cringe-worthy. It was purely intended to be eye-candy, and overtly so; if it were me, I would have even toned down the silly-sexual elements of how she behaves (yes, I know that’s the whole Geck, but it’s just too ridiculous).
First of all, I am obviously not expecting it to be concerned over *my* sensibilities; but you have to ask yourself what is worse.
I have, and I agree that Marvel has, as we say where I come from, “soiled its nest,” but this is like adding insult to injury.
I think it’s both, really; the sexualization here is definitely sexist.
I am still trying to recover from the blatant sexism involved.
They must have diluted it quite a lot to hit them so hard!
I am definitely going to try this out (the paper strip is most likely diluted denatonium, but I can look it up further, and I can always try the dye test first), because I’ve always had trouble with a specific subset of vegetables. I am now tolerant of them, but they still taste really bitter to me.
Which is why an English-speaking venue trying to make something out of it is frankly inane; to top that off, the writing *does* elicit something between a mid-eighties fantasy character and a “kinky” (yeah, right) product name, trying to sound all cool and edgy or whatnot.
The only possible options to deal with this are not particularly fun for the creative team; I don’t expect people who have not done much of any animation or 3D-modeling to see why, so here it goes:
1. You have to deal with the issue of just *where* his cock would be when he is clothed, so you’d look into either…
The coincidence is too great to be just bad luck; this is most likely a hastily traced and slightly edited version so as to make it not too painfully obvious, despite the apparently abject failure at achieving just that.
Hats off to those who will get this reference; kudos, by the way!
Or look at one, or even a sketch of one.
AND APPARENTLY TYPE IN CAPS ON OCCASION AND WITHOUT PUNCTUATION OK?
Ah, so you get to tell people their counterpoints as well; not true, and I am not drinking milk or agreeing with all the people who are fixated with milk. In fact, I often oppose them, since my wife is intolerant to some milk constituent (not yet verified, but possibly a protein). So, without further ado, here it goes!
That article is sheer claptrap.
I agree entirely; however, shouldn't this finally get in some people's heads?