That image looks like a literal rendering of a polished turd.
That image looks like a literal rendering of a polished turd.
Yeah, I hate all those fat cat EPA employees flaunting their bags of money around. What?
Are you suggesting that LESS funding for the EPA will make things cleaner?
You’d think it wouldn’t be a big deal, but as soon as it was announced as a possibility you’d have veery automaker and republican congress person telling everyone how much it would cause 5% lower auto sales, cost 10,000 jobs, and end up somehow costing the government more than it brings in.
“fee-based system in which automakers would pay the laboratory for its work”
This actually makes a lot of sense. Charging quickly like this degrades the batteries faster. After a certain point of wear leveling, Tesla tries to preserve as much battery life as possible.
I think, from now on, there should be a poll and see which “expert” us Jalops agrees with as well as submitting our own recommendation.
I’ll be honest, that looks better than their new grille in my opinion.
Ok I’m going to assume this is the case of the author not writing the headline because there’s some serious lede burying going on here.
Except isnt production capacity Tesla’s main barrier to profitability? If this increases capacity, it is likely more valuable than future cash from from contracts. Also, they will have to honor the current contracts because they are contracts. It’s an issue of future contracts.
The Ferrari emblem every 5 feet on the course is very subtle and tasteful.
Well.. Chevy hasn’t exactly distinguished themselves in the mind of consumers. After a couple of decades worth of boring ugly unreliable junk, people are obviously a little turned off of Chevy. Myself included. I’ll never buy a domestic brand again and especially not a Chevy.
The Leaf can be had for less than half the price of the Bolt, it wins even if it’s not as good.
Extra cost, less aerodynamics.