It turns out that you’re spot on.

It all seems to be on fake-Celiac lady so far.

My son’s a medium-functioning autistic, & he’s not that bad.

About 27 litres.

Well no, because I freely admit that I’m no expert on the topic - as you would’ve ascertained from my comment if you weren’t actually looking for an excuse for a fight.

Right? Next time someone offers me something with kale, I’m going to look them in the eye, & ask them if it’s Illuminati kale.

A bunch of people have said the same thing, but so far, nobody’s given the server crap for it, so I’m leaving it up to M’sieu Pinkham to call it.

Well played.

Okay, no outright Pinkham’s Law comments yet, but the gluten-contaminated toaster story is looking like a veeeeeerrrry likely candidate.

Seriously? The story says straight up that she’d eaten gluten-containing stuff many times before without noticeable ill-effect.

I’m sure we were all mentally humming Duelling Banjos as we read that one.

“It doesn’t really affect the trendy gluten-avoiders, but is actively dangerous to celiacs.”

Probably not, or at least not with me. I’m sure I could arrange a target-rich environment though, if that’s close enough.

Yeah, it totally seems like something that Carson would do.

God help me, I grew up not even 10km from Dame Edna (AKA: Barry Humphreys).

Ironically, I was 4 episodes into binge-watching Boston Legal from the beginning when this post was published. (They’ve shown some seriously weird lawyers on that show.)

It’s something that, amazingly, has not yet happened in the comments yet. Don’t worry; one of the regulars will loudly point it out when it happens.

Well bugger, I was assuming that you were a woman. Would you be willing to settle for a few beers instead?

Seeing as someone’s already getting niggly about “cross-contamination”* between regular & gluten-free bread in the fucking toaster, I have a feeling that you’re right, god help us all.

That sounds right. And hey, if you’re ever visiting Melbourne, Australia, it’s a date. ;)