LET THE HEALING BEGIN
I switched pseudonyms between drafts and missed it on the final read through :(
Same person, I switched pseudonyms between drafts and missed it on the final read through :(
Same person, I changed psuedonyms between drafts. Good catch!
Fixed! Welcome you to email me next time, I'll see it sooner :)
Nowhere do I argue that.
cool, respond to this comment by typing with one finger and your eyes closed.
Not with one finger.
Fair points all around!
HELLLLOOOOO ITS NATASSHAAAAA! I don’t think it would have been that different, do I think it was rape? Yes I do but I also think there’s a segment of the population out there, those who use FC with their love ones who would not believe this issue is cut and dry. Nevertheless, nowhere in the piece do I try to defend or…
Also unclear on what an “invalid opinion” is?
I think facilitated communication causes desperate people with good intentions do very strange things and I believe there are many families you still use it to talk to their non verbal sons/daughters would not put view this as a straight forward rape case.
would you prefer it not be written about then?
Because this is the questions before the judge / jury . And those who believe in facilitated communication could disagree.
Yes and those who believe in facilitated communication might disagree with the courts ruling.
Again, from my understanding, facilitators teach their clients/students/charges FC. Thus, the headline
This is why I find the case so compelling. I’m not sure Stubblefield is as cynical as others might assume given how steadfastly those families who use FC insists it works even in the face of substantial evidence to the contrary.
She taught him facilitated communication.
It was the question placed before the court.