mazdran
Mazdran
mazdran

Oh btw, there is nothing worthy of reading in your tirade. I only continued reading to see if there was redeeming value and there is none. It was a waste of space and of my time. Again, God bless you. You surely need it.

Your reading comprehension sucks and you completely missed the sardonic tone of this article. It is your piece which is nothing but pointless noise. You do realize you are writing an article...about an article...in fucking DEADSPIN....and you have the gall to criticize the other guy’s journalistic integrity? That is

Drew, you’ve lost me. Bitching that someone tried to help free enslaved sex workers and then have 100 desperate, group-think readers race to pat you on the back about doing so, shows we readers will try so hard to be cynical, caustic and hilarious that we will intentionally ignore our decency or morality. I’m

Good to know you’re still an unmitigated piece of shit.

In fairness, the article excerpted above only referred to the opinions of “detractors,” and even they could only say that the rescues “often” lead to bad outcomes, which is less frequent even than “usually.” I’m not an expert, but I’m not going to damn Laroche on the basis of a single excerpted article that says, “But

I can always count on Deadspin and the comment section to let me know who is good and bad. No group think here. Not at all.

Only at a Gawker site could you read that somehow, working as a Thai sex slave is a kind of acceptable status quo. At least so long as the alternative is being removed from that environment by a Christian white guy. A transgender, atheist, though, would be totally cool.

If my names offended you, I’m sorry. My point still stands about people using someone’s faith as a point to make fun of them or talk shit about them. It’s not cool whether they’re a member of a small, marginalized religion or a large, popular religion. Find other things about people to criticize them for

Hey dickcheese, I can take a joke, but what I was referring to originally was not just making a joke about religion. Instead I was talking about using his faith as a reason/method to shit all over the guy. Again, this wasn’t making jokes about religion in general...this was an attack on an individual’s beliefs. You

You know, all you Gawker Media writers must be fun at parties. So crazy optimistic and positive all the time. /s

Really, though, the guy seems like a straight arrow, loves what he loves, a humanitarian, and your immediate first reaction is to downplay that. Wow. Dick much? Fuckin’ wannabe Hipsters. “I hated him before

you sound jealous with your exaggerated sense of outrage

Take it easy, man.

What an awful article you have written. It takes no talent to piece by piece bitch about someone else and someone else’s life. Don’t feel guilty over your doubts feel guilty because you suck at what you do.

I’m not saying there is a vast anti-Christian agenda and I get that the majority of the country is Christian. What is still not ok, regardless of the demographics, is making fun of an individual’s religious beliefs, unless you are willing to do that across the board. I see you ignored everything I wrote though and

Here’s what ESPN needs to get: this is not a special person. There’s nothing to get here. LaRoche is probably a good and boring dude and his kids are probably fine and, in fact, I’ll even take him at his word on the sex slave heist. But he’s not special. And I’m not gonna wallow in guilt because I don’t take my kids

“He’s a Christian white guy who hunts.” Stop the presses! Oh no, we CANNOT have that!

Your disdain for anything/one Christian is laughable. I wish you could sit back and see the hatred in your writing like everyone else does. Sad really.

Totally understand where you're coming from and respect your voice. But as I age I'm not so quick to assign motives to people. Who knows? Maybe the guy's motivation was Pious? Or perhaps he's just a dick......I dunno. Back to work for me. But the writer of the article should contact People Magazine pronto for a

Know what? IF what he said was true about his mission in Thailand than I give the dude some props. Something to be said about doing something about a horrific practice vs. tapping out snippets on a keyboard on a board. Can you dig it? Now if he can only do something about Keown's writing he may be on to something as

Thanks for writing one of the dumbest fucking articles I’ve ever read, responding to another dumb article. You’ve actually made me dumber.