And I’m not trying to be troll-y or anything here; if someone can legit explain how Apple and Google can do what Epic wants and still financially benefit from Fortnite going forward, I’d love to know.

I don’t know why people keep comparing this to retail

Honest question (I’ve not followed this story closely): is Ellen really a terrible tyrant, of just a chief executive who doesn’t know or care how her employees live (like 80% of all chief executives)?

Yeah I was thinking, “This is not at all unusual.” And getting your birthday off is an old union thing.

In other words its like 8O% of all jobs in the US.

I recall from my auto crossing days that the C4s outperformed the C5s despite differences in horsepower, chassis advances, etc.  Without looking up the numbers, my guess is lower and lighter ftw.

One of those showed up to a local autocross driven by a fairly green driver and ended up hurting a lot of feelings that day. C4s are no joke.

So you have used Boxster/Miata/Z3 money for a two seater with a six speed and 300hp. I am not saying the others don’t have their charms, but you get a lot of performance bang for your buck here, also a great choice for a track day rat.  Easy Nice Price.

Many Fortnite players, and maybe even some of the people who birthed Fortnite players, were not alive for Apple’s famous masterstroke of corporate propaganda commercial.

Well, most states (that I know of) requires you to register, and to register you need insurance, which ends up being a lot of money for a non-used car. This is supposed to be a one-time payment to avoid racking up non-payment penalties.

And don’t forget that AAA only takes cash or checks for dealing with DMV-related business!

This is from the Xbox version on Microsoft's site, I don't have the mobile version installed so I can't check it but I'd almost be surprised if it didn't have a similar disclaimer. Unless, of course, Epic intentionally made the mobile V-Bucks cross-platform specifically to use this loophole.

“Will they go after Steam too?”

It’s also distinctly possible that he was rejected on a purely academic basis, just because Mark Meadows nominated him does not necessarily mean he was academically qualified. Not saying that he wouldn’t necessarily have failed the psych eval, just that I don’t have a hard time believing that someone who barely passed…

Guess what: I want you to look me in my fucking eyes when I say this; I really want you to look me in my eyes when I say this. We still have no idea. We have no idea.

He broke California law (and looked like a creep doing it), repeatedly fed his audience false conspiracies and has played much of it off as a joke. He honestly must know why he was banned. Otherwise he’s a massive idiot.

What? Chris has been a wonderful part of Kotaku. I need some got damn answers!

Pour one out for Chris Persons. The powers that be just canned him.

Honestly, the reason for the drop is probably far less interesting than how he’s been very successfully (read as: profitably) sensationalizing the whole thing.

It’s also a shit-fucking world where this clown is the one that gets to keep producing videos.  Fuck Spanfeller.  

Guess you can’t keep a shit person down. I keep telling myself, “surely the people who still support this asshole are just kids.” And then that makes me feel simultaneously better and worse.