Because we're going to believe this monster of a person?

Do you actually know the definition of “assault”, you bellend?

Because it was basically an assault on a disabled individual, in person, and not a “commentary” on an accused rapist from a distance.

Also, fuck her - she did THIS which is far more disgustingly offensive.

What is a “Nicki Minaj” and who the fuck cares?

“Might be”? It's pretty common knowledge it is, plus the nose candy problem is out of control.

But it's not interesting or awesome.

How many times are you guys going to try to pawn this short (from March) off on us?

Who, Dylan? The girl used as a pawn by her psychotic mother?

Fucking morons will perpetuate lies about celebrities based upon ignorance and innuendo...

That's not what happened, but thanks for posting out of ignorance.

Your username suits you, since that is a very lazy response, and doesn't address what I stated at all.

I don’t think “Hollywood” gave two shits about Polanski for the most part, nor did the collective have any disdain for Samantha’s rape, regardless of the vocal outcries of a few.

Thank you, Cherith, for at least responding reasonably and addressing the issues, even though I disagree.

I don't know, but I'd flag your sorry ass in a heartbeat.

So legal malfeasance means nothing to you?

Yeah, and he was willing to serve his time, until the judge reneged on the deal.

Good.

Bullshit.

Mario, being wrong again.