Yeah, this is why people need to STFU with their overly simple narratives of the election. You can tell who does and doesn’t pay attention to things outside of the presidency.

Jenna: “Once Trump got elected, I was like, I’m going to be here—and comments I got from other people in my life that voted for him, like ‘I don’t understand why you’re even going, it’s not like you can change the presidency.’ And I was like, okay, thank you, because now I know for sure that I’m going.”

even if you know the things that you’re asked about, recalling them on the spot is hard.

Feminism is about equality through legal rights and changing outdated cultural attitudes. When you try to take away other women’s rights, you aren’t a feminist.

It was really a case study in what we’re finding more and more with the left, and what was illustrated in the primaries especially: There is a very specific subset of self described “progresive” that believes that economic inequality and a living wage are the ONLY problems impeding a more equitable society. For this…

I know some of them are doing events in their districts. At least one is doing a non-denominational prayer vigil and one is visiting a school. A few others are attending Women’s marches in their states the next day.

Why is demand for actresses less? Are there less female roles? I would be interested in knowing the stats.

I mean to be totally honest, you might want to wait for him to ruin the economy- if you have savings, you will probably be able to pick up a bargain after the next crash (if our currency isn’t horribly debased in the meantime, which it may well be).

White women who want to broadcast their politics (in addition to actually taking action, ahem) could also just wear a t-shirt from Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, Amnesty, SPLC, CAIR, BLM, NOW, NPR, DNC ... the possibilities are endless. Just anything at all besides almost literally #notallwhitewomen.

Because it’s not even the first time? Hell, yesterday Sessions declined to confirm if as Trumps AG he would arrest journalists for doing their jobs in a way the administration disagreed with.

It was a campaign promise and the lapdog media never questioned him about it:

No. Try reading the article.

They did not keep him in the dark about the investigation. They completed the investigation and informed him first, before any action was taken, and he agreed on the course of action presented.

The players do not have a right to speak to “the administration.” The players do not have a right to dictate the timeline. The coach decided to *publicly* back the players in their ill formed protest instead of talking them down. The tweet was basic insubordination. He deserved the firing he received today, and he…

Utter and complete revisionist bullshit. They threatened a boycott unless they lifted the suspensions. Period. They also indirectly demanded the AD be fired.

The presumption that the players had no idea what really happened is ludicrous. Hell many of them were on the message thread the night it went down. Then the “due process” bullshit. They tried to pull a power play not because they were ignorant, but because they didn’t think rules should apply to them.

And my hatred for Mitch Leidner grows. What an arrogant prick. Outgoing senior has a lot of big tough things to say after heading the worst boycott to ever take place. YOU got him fired, Mitch. I hope everyone does transfer. Anyone involved in the boycott shouldn’t be welcomed back. We’ve always been a shitty team,…

The players made an arrogant power play that fans and alumni should be ashamed of. They essentially demanded the AD be fired for following up on the recommendations of the investigation.

The polls weren’t that far off. The election swung on one or two out of every 100 votes.

Someone remind me