beats her with the fry stick. God damn!

Wow. Very inappropriate. You need to realize that in your job people are not going to always agree with you. If you answer them with ‘fuck off’ , you tell them that you do not have the mental capacity to challenge or debate them. Thus, everyone who reads your response will empathize with frankly.

Super unprofessional...

Because a 32 week old child is normally viable outside of the womb?

My wife’s best friend’s daughter was born at 30 weeks and is a perfectly normal child now at 6.

You got issues if you think it’s ok to abort a child at 32 weeks for any ol’ damn reason.

Hey simpleton, Its not solely a choice about a womans body, as if shes deciding whether or not to get her nose pierced. There is another human in the equation, also the father of the child, whose opinion about the life/death of his unborn child should be considered as well. So to reduce this to an issue of telling…

“Way to miss the entire fucking point.”

“You should change the headline - even if just for this woman’s sake - yes, she had an abortion but she did so for a very specific reason and it’s click bait to leave the headline as is. I was horrified by the title and then immediately realized it was misleading.”

So because so many are poor, it’s fair to suggest all are poor.

Wow - really nice way to engage with your readers. What I meant - and clearly I didn't say it correctly so forgive me for not using the exact appropriate words - was that the woman deserves your respect by making the headline clear about the abortion she chose to have - no judgment on my part and I'm deeply saddened…

Wow - angry much? I never said anything about good vs bad - what I said was that the headline leads people to believe exactly what you are accusing me of - sort of 'how could someone choose to have an abortion at 32 weeks' and I think she should be able to have an abortion whenever she wants and for any reason. We're…

You should change the headline - even if just for this woman's sake - yes, she had an abortion but she did so for a very specific reason and it's click bait to leave the headline as is. I was horrified by the title and then immediately realized it was misleading.

Guilty as charged.

Star Wars gets it! (Asian lady fighter pilot!) And even Marvel’s SHIELD show gets it with two Asian female leads. But GOD FORBID the movies.

You mean just rich, right?

Counterpoint, not working with these nations would result in major ramifications that could endanger the US. For example Saudi Arabia, of whom ISIS is a enemy and is hell bent on taking over the country and killing off the monarch and most of the muslims of the nation as they are not the same faith as the muslims that…

AMERICA ENABLES THIS BULLSHIT.

It’s also attainable if you’re a rich POC. StubHub is very inclusive in that way.

So the efforts to make the show as accessible as possible don’t matter, as long as there are scalpers selling some of the tickets for $3,000?

What part of scalpers jacking up prices do you not understand?

They are providing 20,000 tickets to NYC public school children for $10, which includes interacting with the cast members. They’re also increasing the number of tickets available via the lottery (it’s going up to 46). They’re clearly doing what they can to counteract the fact that it’s incredibly popular and is being…