Not only the is the focus on Big Sean weird, but wtf is with the snark towards him for being “smug” and “gloating” because a person he has warned about for years as being dangerous was finally caught? Like that is the exact thing that we’ve been falling over ourselves to praise Rose McGowan for, and rightfully so! But…

The root’s description of jezebel’s beckys(ies?)/rebeccas will forever be one of the most accurate things on kinja

Jezebel has famously fucked up in terms of broader representation/inclusion.

It’s not feminism in this article, it’s nihilism. A toddler being emotionally traumatized was glossed over in favor of reporting on a twitter war.

Seriously. Sometimes I get so frustrated with Jezebel. Being a feminist website doesn’t mean we’re supposed to find domestic violence against men humorous... It’s not like the aim is to fight for all the perks men have and then leave them in the dumps. Not cool.

Not to mention the pretzel knot they had to do to get to the idea that somehow the real bad guy here is evidently a black man who tweeted?

This whole article is a dog whistle to all who think feminism = misandry. They’re already commenting in droves and the article isn’t even 15 minutes old. This is not helpful

In front of their child no less.

It seems odd to me that the Big Sean bit is such an emphasis as well. This is pretty serious, not the subject matter of a Twitter feud between exes.

Isn’t is Dorsey who had the bad day? You know, being assaulted and all? Am I missing crucial info here or is this all a weird tone for a article on domestic violence?

I’m not, actually. Because I’m not a Clinton voter. Because I’m not an American. I had to watch hopelessly as entitled twats like you threw the election because somehow, even though the whole rest of the world (including Vladimir Putin) realizes it has a stake in who’s POTUS, about half of voting-age Americans don’t.…

This is what’s frustrating. Beneath the layers of dumb, dumb fake news and pundit jerk offs there’s the real Hillary Clinton: A kind of boring, overqualified candidate.

“Still blaming Russia...”

Right, and some of the swing states went to Trump with very small margins, which would make a reasonable person wonder how many thousands of votes *were* influenced by online russian troll crap, the emails theft, and possibly other elements of skullduggery that we haven’t even detected. When your margin of victory is…

What the hell do you mean “Handily”? Trump only won the electoral college by about 80,000 votes in three states. And evidence is starting to pile up that a lot of his wins were because of a massive social media campaign put on by people/entities outside of the U.S

“Handily” is a stretch. Send about 80,000 votes in key swing state counties in the other direction, and the electoral college tally would better reflect the popular vote outcome.

I think it says more about people in general than it does about her. Also “handily” is a pretty strong word for someone that lost the popular vote by almost three million.

Your point might scan better if the person who won wasn’t also all of those things, in addition to being barely literate and a serial sexual abuser.

She was just trying to scare people away from the White House by making them believe it was haunted by a hideous orange goblin, so she could dig for the Civil War gold hidden beneath it.

I can’t wait until 45 peels off his orange mask to reveal that it was Hillary under there all along. Scooby and the gang will be so shocked!