Not passive aggressive. Aggressive.
Not passive aggressive. Aggressive.
Why can’t men accept impotence as what it so very clearly is? God’s will for them.
No worries: Some shitforbrains is already in with ‘nobody put a gun to his head/he knew the risks’ tomfuckery. Yes: I’m sure as an eleven-year-old boy in 1999, Tyler performed a thorough risk/reward assessment on post-NFL CTE-induced physical and psychological impairment.
This
I’m just impressed you understood his comment enough to respond. I’m still trying to figure out which parts are autocorrect and which parts are the failures of our education system.
Remind me to introduce you to the concept of a joke sometime.
Haha! What a dick.
Fascist agents of the dystopian corporate police state: They’re just like us!
Wow, tell us more
Ah yes, famed scientific journal “Daily Caller”.
In response to idea #2: No. That will be the death knell of manufacturing in the U.S. (though, it’s probably unavoidable at this point). Sure, it takes jobs away from China, but it does nothing to help America’s middle class, or our economy. Especially since American companies could easily just put those automated…
that this website has no interest in serious dialogue, but rather, juvenile name-calling in a self-created vacuum of ignorance.
Even assuming that the things you’re proposing could actually work, the people cheering for Trump aren’t cheering for the replacement of low-skilled, unpaid American laborers with robots. They’re cheering because they think he’s going to somehow bring back jobs *for them*. The story here is not whether manufacturing…
I’m curious about your comment. Yes, this article obviously has a very blatant anti-Trump bias. I don’t think the writers or editors of Gizmodo, or really any of the Gawker properties, are generally interested in serious dialogue. In fact, they would probably happily admit that “juvenile name-calling” is a large…
There needs to be an on-going segment here called, “Meanwhile, In Canada....” that helps us to keep things in perspective.
“Most of the respondents were young, white married men who are worried that the presence of women in their small teams could create complications in their home life, sexual harassment or affairs. They believe the risk could affect the family-like trust of the group.”
Old white men yell at things.
Did he say it was a legal obligation? Chill the fuck out you spaz.
...I don’t know that not wearing gear and passing on a double yellow equate to assault with a vehicle...
I’m not gonna bother casting you as a villainous buffoon who’s wrong about everything... You’ve done that plenty well yourself by vocally liking The Amazing Spider-Man movies.
I’m just gonna ask - do you think science is just a matter of opinion? When you trot out the oft-repeated, but nonetheless repeatedly debunked…