What are you talking about? This came to light because Tambor disclosed it to the Hollywood Reporter, and then Jessica raised the issue with the New York Times. No one’s, like, peering in in on a tiff where people have asked for privacy.

I get what you’re saying, but I think acting like people being outraged on the internet is a huge problem for Bateman is disingenuous.

Bad and lazy take. Listen to the audio. Jessica Walter explains through tears that Tambor verbally harassed her to an extent no one else had in 60 YEARS on the job, and Bateman and the other guys talk over her about how it actually is understandable because acting is “such a weird job,” the creative process, etc.

Listening to the audio was rough — he seems completely unconcerned with Jessica Walter, who is literally crying in front of all of them, and talks over Alia when she merely tries to say behavior like this isn’t okay.

Wait really? Buster and Maeby definitely had two of the better episodes, which is part of the reason I like the new edit more — you don’t have to wait until the end of the season to see their material.

This is fair. The revival especially bore this out — Emily’s material was a step above Lorelai’s, and less said about Rory the better...

Uh... she had the biggest movies of the year in 2015, 2016 and 2017 in the US.

Yeah, BB-8 was funny and enjoyable TFA but pretty much entirely over-the-top (to an almost Scrappy-Doo like extent) throughout TLJ.

It’s the only model that Southwest flies.

The entire point of the article is to dig into the math of what happens when you’re already at retirement age but haven’t set aside enough to be comfortable.

As someone who thinks the fourth season was actually good aside from some wildly overly-long episodes (38 minutes!) this is going to be an interesting release.

Yeah, that’s what will be interesting.

Yeah, I kind of think a general reaction of “it was decent!” has been spun into Ultron being a disappointment around these parts. I saw it again last year and it was a good time.

Great anecdote from the guest star. These reviews are always worth getting into, even when the episodes aren’t.

The issue is that he decided to bring “transparency” to Hillary’s emails (which, of course, ended up largely being duplicates that had already been reviewed) while never mentioning to the public that members of Trump’s campaign had been under investigation since July of 2016. This was during early voting. He…

He stood up to Trump and his authoritarian impulses by... *checks notes*... breaking department procedure more than once in 2016, always in high-profile ways that help Trump’s campaign.

Stop watching Hannity.

Love to be told Trump is a danger by the guy who did more than almost anyone else to put him in office.

I’d never thought of it this way —seems like quite a motivator. Thanks!

It reminds me a little of the NYT “scoop” a couple of months ago about Hillary not firing the religious adviser who hit on a staffer during her 2008 campaign, when she instead suspended him without pay and require he attend some type of classes.