Trump only works as a believable villain if you set the story in an alternate, hellscape timeline that skewed off of ours in 1955.

Sounds good to me. If the scalpers are forced to sell at a significant loss, I could pick one up for cheap. I get a reasonable price, they get screwed, everyone wins.

I’m not saying it was a secret astronaut... but it was a secret astronaut.

Alternate pitch. They use an IP they already own, and they don’t have to rename anything:

Easy, tell them they took “gullible” out of the dictionary.

It’s actually worse than that. He says he regrets hurting him BECAUSE Paul Pelosi wasn’t his target. Meaning, “I regret hitting him with a hammer when what I really wanted  to do was kill Nancy Pelosi with a hammer.”

I got a Community notification for this?

Presumably the tiles won’t have the same problems as the shuttle, since there’s no foam to strike them.

I have to assume that Back to the Future is 98% of the reason anyone still cares about DeLoreans.

Snyder knows how to put together a really cool image. He just doesn’t know how to get to that image or what to do after.

Wallace v. Andre: Dinner of Justice: The Snyder Cut

Unless I get Master Nguyen, then I’m all the heroes.

I’m still annoyed that Hearthstone changed the battlegrounds perks cost from a currency you could earn in-game to one you had to buy. Which is why I don’t get perks anymore.

This site explains all those terms: google.com

Here’s my solution: don’t buy them. There’s no reason to.

For what it’s worth, an Apple TV+ subscription is about half as much as HBO.

Yeah, to populate foliage or to give NPCs varied routines. Nothing that’s actually story-based.

Right, but what’s interesting about that interior? Why would I want to explore it? What’s the value of being able to generate an entire office building interior if it just has, at best, random loot to pick up? Machines can’t do environmental storytelling because they don’t know how to make stories.