The article kind of led me to believe that the dress code itself was sexist and not JUST the way it was presented. I agree with the latter but not the former.
KeyVictory
keyvy
It seems your reading more into this than what was actually meant, taking a literal meaning you obviously know not to be true in order to take the piss out of it. In similar fashion I'm sure the girls can wear whatever the hell they want underneath the clothing which actually shows on top.
The result of the dress requirement is not the same.
Because some people seem to be reading my post and then coming up with conclusions which I had no intention of setting, let me requote myself:
So you went with a tell them what they can wear approach, which is what they did with the boys. They went with a more open ended approach and only addressed discretion on what not to wear for the girls. In the end, they accomplish a slightly different dress code, perhaps better, but up to interpretation.
The boy's dress code seems much more restrictive. The girl's dress code only needs more paragraphs because its more open ended at allowing them to craft their own outfits as opposed to the dress shirt, dress slacks, dress shoes, tie and mandatory shaving the boys are subjected to. Because its open ended and doesn't…