keoki
Keoki
keoki

Because we are concerned about those who cannot be vaccinated for VALID reasons (not fake perceived reasons based on idiotic beliefs), and need herd immunity to be high enough to protect them.

Like children who are immuno compromised

or those allergice to specific ingredients in vaccines (and there is no alternative)

or

Pass SB277 -eliminating Religious and Personal belief exemptions and mandatory vaccinations needed to attend any public School in the State of California (the only exemption that can be used is Medical Exemptions)

wish more states would follow what California did.

Her reaction in this scene was so genuine. I love her. Love Grant.

So you deny farmers being sued by corporations over seed “overblow”, majority of GMO investment being in resistance to patented herbicides, I could continue.

Im in Incognito Mode on Chrome. No plugins/extensions are working. No adware spyware infection. No malware. No history, no cache, no cookies (since Incognito mode doesn’t save this information)

Maybe try from a proxy from other than the US? (I’m on a Japanese proxy)

Oh really now? Explain this:

Oh...I guess this renders his entire premise moot?

Again so what? None of them supported their case to show I’m wrong.

Lots of people don’t monetize their content ( several countries do nothe allow it ). Doesn’t mean that the copyright owners cant. ADS are added upon monetization.

So what? Are they in the Content ID program like I am? I wouldn’t care what someone who doesn’t know how the system works, say. It’s like a dentist telling a brain surgeon that what they are doing is wrong.

Too bad you are in the wrong

There are five ad formats on YouTube : Pre-roll video which includes skippable and non-skippable video ads, in video pop-up (also known as the overlay ads), sponsor cards, and side ads. Content ID claimers, get to choose the type of ads to serve, based on what they choose in their policy . They earn money off all five

Well lookee here:

sorry, but that is not evidence. the claims made by someone who is not a YouTube google employee or doesn’t have the documents, is not evidence. It still his uneducated opinion on what happened.

Top add:

I’m reading the direct documents givent to Content ID account holders. The Help articles are often out of date and require feedback to get them updated. The articles you linked to do not dispute anything I’ve said.

What are you asking?

“Cannot monetize” in the screenshot given is as explained here:

It all boils down to what the Content ID Claimant has uploaded as an asset to their CMS (which is turned into a digital signature). I’m sure there are false positives happening as a lot of songs have similar melody’s or outright, take lyrics from another song to use in it’s own.

But so far, the system seems to be

My issue is that it shouldn’t have happened in the first place. The system is encouraging a “shoot first, ask questions later” environment, and it’s been out of control.