No, and why the hell would I? Filing 140 lawsuits + 700 settled cases against farmers, the largest customer base of Monsanto, is way out of whack. Show me another industry where a company has taken 840 legal actions against their customer base (aside from trying to collect money).

Can you please elaborate this point? You seem to know more than me.

and you would be right if you weren’t wrong. in case you didn’t notice he says he’s done this before and it worked.

If I put up footage of a Sony product, Sony will remove all of google’s ads from my footage.

In this video, Jim has purposely forced the Content ID robot to implode in on itself because the content ID claims cancel each other out. One company, Nintendo, claims the video uses their content, and so they try to monetize it. Another company, Take Two, claims the video ALSO uses their content, and so they try to…

him tying up the content ID system is just his way of preventing those companies from profiting off of his videos.

he’s created a situation where the companies have to decide among themselves and all they’ll get out of it is virtually no money.

I thought monetizing was not a prerequisite to getting a claim.

nothing on youtube’s information shows what happens when more then one company tries to claim. so if anything its a bug in the system which as a result, will require rights holders and youtube to figure out. which may lead to “negotiations.”

How does this apply in this situation? Sterling already does not want to monetize the video.

Are you sure about that? According to the screenshot, WMG has opted to monetize. This means ads should be activated automatically on the video, and all the revenue they generate would go to WMG, no?

If you look at his post-release comments he explained it pretty clearly.

Since before Google owned it? Are you an ancient wise man? /s

continue reading the comments on this article. I posted/explained how it works.

I already did, several times in this article as comments. I have two posts that explain how it works, they are just “pending approval” right now.

So they need to get “recommended” so they can be seen.

Thank you for the correction. As it was presented to me in 2013, the ad share was not split among other content Id matches when I joined the program.

what he did doesn’t do anything. he is completely 100% wrong on what he thinks happened.

I had to dig for the Content ID Guide for YouTube since everything is handled through their CMS (for Content ID)

But again, Jim is wrong.

Policy column is the chosen Policy determined by the copyright holder as to what policy to apply once the digital fingerprint of an asset is matched, and the policy is then applied

In…

And I’ve been using YouTube since its inception (yeah before Google purchased it) Doesn’t mean that HE knows everything, and he surely doesn’t have a CONTENT ID account like I do.

He knows jack shcitte about how Content Id works, and his ‘work around” is complete bull hockey pucks. He doesn’t even understand that the…

and your post shows how you don’t understand how ads work with monetization.