I’m not saying you’re wrong (and personally, I’d probably do my best to wait at least that long myself), but that’s actually a good deal longer than I was expecting people to ask for. In general I’d say it’s good form to wait at least a week, and for a pop-culture focused enterprise (say, a website or a podcast), I’d…

To me, if there’s an episode that’s aired but that you haven’t seen, you’re an episode behind. By your definitions, swap “you haven’t seen this week’s yet” for “you’re an episode behind” in my earlier comment.

What’s really curious is that the AV Club has featured three articles about the episode so far on Tuesday, with none of the headlines being the least bit spoilery, making their trio of increasingly-spoilerish headlines on Monday seem more like an active choice.

Not even a passing mention of the Star Wars episode of The Muppet Show, which was (as per the norm for that show) genuinely amusing?

I don’t really see anything in this article that implicates “superhero cinema” above and beyond typical blockbusters for the troubles faced by ongoing single-screen theaters. If Marvel’s The Avengers had fizzled instead of succeeded, shuttering the MCU, would neighborhood single-screen houses be in better shape?

And this is how you write a headline about an episode with a shocking event without spoiling said shocking event for the people who haven’t had a chance to watch the episode yet.

Clicks is clicks.

Which means the lesson is: if you’re an episode behind on any buzzy prestige TV series, don’t come here; the AV Club obviously cares more about clicks from people who are caught up than about spoilering major twists for even 24 hours.

And the world loses another Idiot. RIP, good sir, and thanks for all the snappy answers.

OK, now they’re legit trolling.

I have no problem with them having articles about it, I just think it’s possibly a sub-optimal choice to have the headlines of said articles spoiling the shocking event. Because, as you say, people might decide to stop coming to this site the day after any series they watch but were late watching an episode of, and…

Pedro Pascal is Wario.

So, how many times in one day will the AV Club spoil this shocking twist in a headline?

Keeping Lars Mikkelsen in the role is a good start; his performance is a major part of what made the character work in Star Wars Rebels.

Don’t go undermining someone’s commentary with mere facts; that’s a woke Commie tactic.

In all fairness, I think the only news that would be universally well received and not contentious at all is if somehow Disney found pristine master negatives of the original trilogy’s pre-Special-Edition cuts and struck new prints for re-release.

It’s a fun heist movie that would’ve been improved if they didn’t feel the need to shoehorn in as much Han Solo backstory as possible... including stuff that really didn’t need backstory, like the name “Solo”.

His character did, but that hasn’t stopped this franchise before.

I can understand someone sifting through all the muck and allegations and counter-allegations in the Depp/Heard trials and deciding to give Depp the benefit of the doubt and still hire him. I don’t agree with it, but I can understand it.

Penultimate line of article: