jerryb1969
jerryb1969
jerryb1969

Yeah, gun lo jacking works so well. *coughfastandfurious*

It does not matter. Obama has disenfranchised the independent voter, setting the Democrat party back a decade. They could prance out a 10/10 all star President, and the voters will not care.

Granted, since most liberals only surround themselves with liberal friends, they will not realize this. Just like the majority

The DNC is getting nervous. Sanders is more socialist than they want. The liberals wants to get into the pockets of the rich to line their own pockets, but Sanders would socialize everything to the point everyone would be equally broke...which scares the rich liberal elites.

Sander’s Leninist approached to socialism

There are two things they will have to counter before they can even think about this.

The first is cost. Electric vehicles are insane expensive compared to gas vehicles. Going totally electric would have a serious negative effect on the middle and low income classes.

The most important thing is the limited range of

The effect is bioluminescent plankton that, due to the ships wake, become agitated and glow. It is a rather common sight among Navy sailors.

I have to applaud the ad hominin attack on conservatives. Not many bloggers would go out of their way to employ such a blatant fallacy to move their agenda as it is considered bad journalism.

Then again, I guess working for the Gawker collective, you would not know about bad journalism. Sure, you may practice it, but

Processed meat does NOT cause cancer. It will increase your likely hood of getting cancer.

It is VERY important to differentiate between the two so people can fulling understand the truth, and not be misled by people pretending to have the information.

We are subjected to carcinogens 24/7. It is even in the group

People have the right to believe what they want to believe, even if it is wrong. After all, if people could not believe in wrong things then liberals would have to give up on their socialist mentality which has failed every time it has been attempted.

Does it really matter what one person just thinks about another? I have negative thoughts about people of my own race just based on observations of that person. That does not make me a racist.

We have laws in place to prevent racism, but we cannot police what people think. I abhor people who wear saggy pants. I think

It is this mentality that has people running in circles on the issue. Maybe, instead of pointing out how people are different and then saying that it should not matter, we should focus that reasons they are not.

You cannot point out how a person is different, but then expect them to be the same. After all, they are

Ah, the logic of trying to make everyone equal by constantly pointing out how different we are.

We will never have equality until we quite drawing these lines.

It is not just Chicago. Illinois as a whole is swirling the toilet bowl due to corruption, and the tax and spend mentality to pay for the ever growing list of social programs used to by office in Chicago and Springfield.

This is why is needs to be specific. With the vague description, carbon particulates that have nothing to do with the discussion will used to bolster ‘evidence’ to make the issue appear much large than it actually is.

Defining variables is very important in science, as anyone in the sciences knows. If incorrect

You are right because people do not let things like facts and honesty get in the way of furthering an agenda. I was confused and thought science was about precision and facts, silly me.

Carbon is an element, yes.

No, I am not saying either. I am saying to call a duck and duck, and to not intentionally mislabel something in hopes that no one notices, and they can misconstrue the data by including real carbon emissions which have nothing to do with green house effects.

My objection is calling it “Carbon” emissions. Carbon is a solid material and not a cause of greenhouse effect. The only reason to use the term carbon emissions is that it blurs the line to allow the inclusion of non-greenhouse agents into data to intentionally skew the data points for nothing more than pushing an

Just so show how flawed this who idea is, and how Gawker is swallowing the story without any fact checking just to push their agenda, Carbon is a solid and not a greenhouse gas.

Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas, but also an important part of photosynthesis which creates oxygen.

Obama is intentionally using a flawed

Talk about leading our readers. ‘A cruel lethal injection drug’? The justices did not find it cruel, and I am sure that the majority of the readers will not either.

However, you go out of your way to interject your opinion under the guise of reporting a news worthy piece, and intentionally vilify the Supreme Court by

You are not keeping with the liberal narrative. Everything involving criminals is not their fault, and thusly everyone involved in the judicial process is to blame for incarnating these poor people.