But when a writer decides to turn off a previously omni-competent female cop or solider's brain for no other reason than so she can be saved by OUR HERO? Well, if the writer concerned doesn't like being called a sexist they shouldn't make it so damn easy.

Woah, you're making a LOT of assumptions. A character needing help DOESN'T make them helpless. That's not congruent. If you bothered to actually read my post instead of knee-jerking you would also see I didn't say every time.

Amazing contribution.

Good article. I believe characterization and writing are more important when it comes to characters who need saving, gender shouldn't be an issue.

Crying about the "objectification" of a fictional character in general is pretty idiotic. Whining about the shoes of said fictional character (especially in light of all the other changes made to it) just tips the moronicness scales.

Argument? I simply told you what you are.

and you're an idiot. We done here?

You're not very smart if you think a single word = 50% of that statement. But since you do seem to be autistic, I'll do you a favor.

I called people idiots for getting upset about shoes. That has not changed. But please to continue to get upset over the small part of my statement you can attack.

Companies make many decisions based on many factors.

Yeah you are, but you would still be wrong and trying to cling to what you want over what Nintendo dictates.

Here's how it works: You're allowed to have an opinion, and I'm allowed to call you an idiot if that opinion is moronic, which it is in this case.

Fair enough. I'll concede that you're pathetic enough to care about the difference between a shoe having a gap or not.

Sorry, but I've never seen anyone's nitpicking a of trivial things be an effective method of nothing except appeasing their own desire for "social justice".

1. "You were correct but I'll just play it off as a joke." Okay then.

Sorry, I do tend to get upset when people act incredibly stupid.

1. So a gap in between the heel = "OMG SEXUAL OBJECTIFICATION!!!"? Semantics.

where did I tell her to stop? I called her an idiot, which she is.

You are an idiot in the purest form. There is nothing for me to "understand". This is not a conversation, this is me telling you that you are an idiot. You can accept that and learn to better yourself, or you cannot. The choice is yours.