The fuck, people. Put a bunch of dirt into a few dumpsters, drive it to the hole, and pour it in.

Yours truly,
An internet commenter who is not a scientist

Who calls a photographer a “shooter”? Do you call your writers “hacks”?

On second thought...

Hard to say for sure, but I thought it was 5 on 1 and 2 on the other.

“They want the ball and they’re gonna score!”

I’m not buying this. They’ve got one guy saying that his boss prescribed HGH to Manning’s wife. No documents. No other witnesses. No blood tests. No evidence. Just a guy speculating as he drove in his car.

Who cares?

Hmm ... which is more likely; Manning was dumb enough to have HGH shipped to his HOUSE (of all places), or this documentary has a few factual errors ...

Sadly, Al-Jazeera is far more reputable as a news source than most of the purely American media.

I went from “Woah!” to “Bored with it” in record time with this story.

Does anyone even care of it is true? The guy is almost 40 and still playing in the league, just a few years after he had his spine glued back together.

Peyton is technically correct as it is has become abundantly clear that the performance enhancing drug he actually takes is

“I can do for you what I did for Ryan Howard and Ryan Zimmerman!” is the worst drug dealer pitch of all time.

There is no angle that makes it indisputable that the kick is good. That’s why the rule exists. I think they should add lasers/lights pointing up inside the top of the posts making it easily distinguishable if it goes over or not, but football is run by morons and they won’t do that...

I’m a committed Duke hater, and I have to agree. The GIF at the top makes it seem like it’s good, but on the actual game tape, there’s no question that while it was heading towards being good, it was wide right at the plane of the goalposts.

How can you review a play that is impossible to review? There’s no camera angle in that stadium that’s going to give you DEFINITIVE INDISPUTABLE evidence that the field goal was good. It’s a total judgement call and it cannot be anything else. In baseball though it’s reviewable if the ball even goes above the foul…

The camera is placed between the uprights, so by definition if the football is above the uprights then the replay would give a WORSE angle than what the official sees.

I feel very comfortable in saying that was no good. You can see the ball to the left of the goal post.

Sounds like some people are nitpicking to me. I don’t notice the inconsistencies in the background until someone points it out. I enjoy the portraits for what they are. Just portraits. I understand that the portraits can be different than the character sprites. They are similar enough that I can tell which portraits…

I grew up with those old graphics also and I welcome the new graphics. Not disappointed at all.

Are the graphics really that bad? I don’t find anything wrong with them. I enjoy the vibrant colors.