The New York Times says that it did add context. So much so that admitted they were wrong and saying the media should show humility and self reflection... where as you are doubling down on what I can guess is your personal vendetta against children.

Other video didn’t add any context??? Seriously?

Well, first off, CNN, New York Times, Post, etc all have refuted and retracted the statement that they surrounded him when the longer video showing context came out.

Why does it feel like you are on the side of guys saying that the oppressive government (using their words) “is giving faggots rights” and “the bible condemns homosexuality” and against children waiting for a bus retorting “they are still people” to those statements?

No you are the one on the hate group side, go through my comment history and find anything homophobic in my history: the SPLC defines the group the kids were against as a homophobic hate group. You are on the wrong side of history, and rather than admit you didn’t look into the facts and let your eagerness for…

I get it you are homophobic, you align yourself with the POC group that SPLC has on their hate list who are angry that the government is (in their own words) “give faggots rights”, rather than with children who say things like “they are still people” in response to just words.

Did you watch the part of the video showing the group the teens were against the black racist group (the SPLC has the black hebrew israelites on their hate group list) when the black leader was saying:

You aren’t so uniformed to not know that they already interviewed Nathan Phillips giving HIS SIDE OF THE STORY WITH NO REBUTTAL FROM THE VICTIM, to America.

The fact that I’ve not heard any reports of this data being sold, etc a month after reporting the attack a month ago (supposedly they had been hacked since 2014). I gotta guess it was a state sanctioned targeted attack and they weren’t interested in CC numbers, sellable personal data, etc. but true espionage. It’s…

Target reported that it cost them $252 million dollars, but it’s total impact was reduced by insurance and tax deductions from the data loss brought it down to $105 million.

I really dislike articles like this, as it didn’t give nearly enough details which then frames the conversation intentionally skewed. They voted against an amendment to the KEYSTONE PIPELINE XL bill. An amendment that was pure politics and nothing more, there was no “<X> needs to be done” or anything actionable at all.…

Ummm... GM killed the VOLT, you know the one that had the incentive. The ones they are keeping are the larger vehicle ones (crossovers, trucks, SUV’s, etc) that in general don’t get the economic incentive.

Guessing they were part of the team securing the physical area. They often use local forces to augment the security group.

Honestly I disagree with major payments to the students for playing, because it’s a SCHOOL not the pros. But I also disagree with the school getting it’s bazillions of dollars from them as well; I think there is a completely different plan that should be done. School’s are for preparing students for the future, that…

We ALWAYS need context. I can guarantee that there was a reason for this to occur (i.e. the context) then and ONLY then can we decide what was or was not reasonable actions. IMO from the multiple sources reporting on this Deadspin seemed to intentionally omit a fairly critical detail (see below) I mean even if they…

You forgot these differences between EU and the US

I can basically guarantee the crown prince wasn’t involved. There is no need for him to make any decisions on it, or even have a discussion about it. He has people that put forward his will on “dark ops” and keep him completely insulated from it. I wouldn’t even expect him to be briefed on anything after it happened,…

I think the registry is a no go from the get go now because of what has happened.

Please, of the things you mentioned I don’t think any of them would have really prevented any of the mass shootings. Especially parts about how many guns and how much ammo one can have, like seriously have you thought about it at all?

Since obviously you don’t think it’s too soon... so what exactly went wrong here? You obviously know a lot about what happened, if the person illegally got the gun off the streets, if they stole the gun from a family member, or if they got it completely legally and what part of the gun laws to change to have prevented…