Maybe it’s just me, but I would have watched as many WWII-era Captain America films as they could make. :P

Star Trek’s an easy punching bag. It believes in something, wears it on its sleeve, and occasionally stumbles along the way.

Depends if they’re loaded...

How is Bruce Wayne the smartest man on the planet? He’s a shallow rich-boy illusion to mask Batman. As far as anyone beyond the JLA knows, he’s at best a successful CEO... unless getting engaged to Catwoman is really that impressive?

Go sit in the corner.

Naah. Civil War was nothing but a 2-hour advertisement for the upcoming Black Panther & Spiderman movies. The airport fight was the peg on which they hung their flimsy premise.

There is legislation to make sure that liquor companies don’t prey on addicts and underaged kids. There’s also legislation (at least where I am) that restricts marketing and minimum cost per sale.

That’s not at all what Outrider said, but kudos on that strawman you’ve set up.

No one is saying that because addiction exists that the locii of those addictions should be banned. If you don’t have a problem with alcohol, then by all means, go buy yourself an Arrogant Bastard or three, and enjoy the evening.

Those who…

So what you’re saying is that you’d like video games to be regulated in a manner similar to how alcohol is, where there are limits on how much you can buy, which stores can sell them, whether or not you can be using them in public, where they can have additional taxes placed on them, where there are age limits imposed…

This kind of response could only come from someone who has never dealt with an addiction of their own—or either does not know any addicts, or has no empathy for them whatsoever because, “It’s easy for me, so it should be easy for you.”

If that’s your thought process, then I ask you: should things that are easy for…

The only people that loot boxes etc... ‘prey’ on are those who are incapable of delaying their own gratification.

Oliver’s kryptonite arrow was the only thing in the entire event that bothered me. The first thing I said after “awesome!” was “Wait: A) how did he know she’s vulnerable to kryptonite, B) where did he get the kryptonite?!”

Buddy of mine had a great theory on that: He’s not running the Fatherland because he’s been protecting Mother Russia from them this whole time. 

Im 90% sure it was Xandar as one of those planets, the architecture was a dead ringer for the Nova Corps buildings from GotG1

OR, what if Loki, in an attempt to save the very vulnerable Asgardians, does a glamour spell that makes it LOOK like they’re all dead, hands over the tesseract to Thanos as if he’s on his side, and leaves with the very much still alive Asgardians to safety.

TOTALLY sounds like something Loki would do.

I like this trailer because it looks like the Avengers won’t have to spend any time pointlessly fighting each other as fanboy service.

I like that sequence of events. Then, with Thor and Banner defeated and out of the picture, Loki, out of options, buys the lives of the Asgardians and Sarkaarans with the Tesseract.

Really? I could have sworn it was one of the planets in the montage when Ego was activating his spores(?).

“But this... this does put a smile on my face,” Thanos continues, as he attaches a second Infinity Stone to his gauntlet and proceeds to smack the shit out of Iron Man. The stones, purple and blue, are the Power and Space Stones respectively. We saw Loki offering the Tesseract/Space Stone willingly earlier, but…

You mean like this one? ;)