Fair enough, Im not afraid to say that I am ignorant to the machinations of DJT’s twitter account. I figured the absence of 3+ syllable words pointed to his writing it though, unlike the “accumulation of data” that Bannon likely wrote.

No that was DJT’s personal account that was then retweeted by his POTUS acct.

Great article - probably should have been published at least a week ago though.

Stay off The Concourse dipshit.

ISD?

or is one circle.

HIPAA should have prevented him from acquiring the records, not disseminating them.

While I think you have good taste - that sounds like a hard pass. thanks for the info tho.

yep. even if he isnt a good fighter for his size (which who knows)- he is still a goliath that could probably crush my head like a melon.

Given that I like/religiously watch almost all of those shows listed - what is Happy Endings most comparable to? Im not even really sure that I have heard of it.

I guess you skimmed past the part where an entirely different “credible” witness says that he didnt lean into, nor try to enter said car.

*invented

Well, if/when companies do take said privileges away they tend to also not expect you to keep performing your duties - instead of you know keep doing them but better.

Why does everyone insist that the arc of history bends toward justice, and that people are by and large fundamentally good?

I am not sure that these are safe assumptions, since they arent necessarily proven out. This article posits a pretty similar argument against the assumption that people are mostly “good”:
http://www…

I dunno about Bernie primary voters being demonized - as someone who supported Bernie at our caucus, and later voted for Hillary - I didnt really see that.

The BernieBros that started stumping for Johnson and Stein while dumping all over Clinton and giving momentum to insignificant news stories - they deserve every…

Especially considering a great deal of their water goes through other states before it arrives there...

“well if you had told us you were staying in the hotel...”

it is literally one of the first things that comes out of his mouth even before they start searching him.

In fairness, he was probably just as dumb before, but most people with an IQ of 100+ were not paying any attention whatsoever.

I would also say that his speaking style would come off as incredibly condescending if it wasnt obvious that he is just that dumb.

Well if it were according the letter of the rule (posted by OP), it would matter because it would fall outside of the scope of the rule (i.e., not a penalty - regardless of potential for harm or dirtiness of play) - since he is more using the side of his helmet, but of course it appears that there is more to the rule.

These data sets are probably actually pretty clean and somewhat readily available. Police shooting data OTOH is often purposefully obscured, fragmented and/or protected.